Proof workspace · Iwahori level · functions · F2

Family by family

Each spherical variety of the paper's families, and a few neighbours, decided at the level of compactly supported functions with the tools of F1, or left open with the next computation named. The status table at the end collects every case.

Tools 1–4 and Theorem A: F1. Setting, criterion, Lemma A–Corollary D and Propositions E–G: Iwahori pages. The positive case \(\mathbb A^n\): 𝔸ⁿ pages. Conventions as on F1: left modules on \(X=G/H\), residue characteristic \(\ne2\), \(\operatorname{char}F=0\) where a cited theorem needs it.

1 · \(\mathrm{GL}_n/(\mathrm{GL}_p\times\mathrm{GL}_q)\)

Proposition B · \(\mathrm{GL}_n/(\mathrm{GL}_p\times\mathrm{GL}_q)\)(i), (ii) proved · (iii) open

\(X=\mathrm{GL}_n/(\mathrm{GL}_p\times\mathrm{GL}_q)\), \(p\le q\), \(n=p+q\). SG holds (paper's family; for \(p=q=1\) also by hand, Proposition F).

  1. \(q=p\): IG fails and \(Q_X\ne0\). Two witnesses: \(\mathrm{St}_{2p}\otimes\chi_0\) (Theorem A) and the untwisted \(\mathrm{St}_{2p}\), which is \(M_{p,p}\)-distinguished (Tool 3, Shalika model).
  2. \((p,q)=(1,2)\): IG fails and \(Q_X\ne0\), witness \(\pi=\mathrm{St}_2\times\mathbf 1\) of \(\mathrm{GL}_3\).
  3. \(q=p+1\ge3\) and \(q\ge p+2\): open. No Steinberg twist is a witness (Tool 2), and for \(q\ge p+2\) no generic representation is (Tool 3). The candidate in every case is the Iwahori-spherical, self-dual, non-\(K\)-spherical representation
$$\pi_{p,q}:=\mathrm{St}_{2p}\times\mathbf 1_{\mathrm{GL}_{q-p}}\qquad(\text{Arthur parameter }\mathrm{Sym}^{2p-1}\oplus\mathrm{Sym}^{q-p-1}_{\mathrm{Arthur}}),$$

which is exactly the shape the relative Langlands prediction gives for \(X\)-distinguished parameters (\(\check G_X=\mathrm{Sp}_{2p}\), Arthur \(\mathrm{SL}_2\) principal in \(\mathrm{GL}_{q-p}\)); (i) and (ii) are the cases \(q-p=0\) and \((p,q)=(1,2)\) of this candidate. Deciding (iii) is the question whether \(\pi_{p,q}\) is \(M_{p,q}\)-distinguished.

Proof

Proof of (i), (ii)

  • (i) \(\mathrm{St}_{2p}^I\ne0=\mathrm{St}_{2p}^K\), \(\widetilde{\mathrm{St}}=\mathrm{St}\), and \(\mathrm{St}_{2p}\) is \(M_{p,p}\)-distinguished by Tool 3 (Theorem 6.1 with \(k=2p\), \(\rho=\mathbf 1\); Shalika implies linear). Tool 1.
  • (ii) \(\pi=\operatorname{Ind}_{P_{2,1}}^{\mathrm{GL}_3}(\mathrm{St}_2\otimes\mathbf 1)\) (normalized) is irreducible (the segments \(\{\nu^{-1/2},\nu^{1/2}\}\) and \(\{\nu^0\}\) are not linked), a subquotient of \(\nu^{1/2}\times\nu^{-1/2}\times\mathbf 1\), so \(\pi^I\ne0\); \(\pi^K\simeq(\mathrm{St}_2\otimes\mathbf 1)^{M(\mathcal O)}=0\) by \(G=PK\); \(\tilde\pi=\widetilde{\mathrm{St}}_2\times\mathbf 1=\pi\); \(M_{2,1}\)-distinguished by Tool 3 (Prasad, Venketasubramanian). Tool 1.

2 · \(\mathrm{SL}_{2n}/\mathrm{Sp}_{2n}\) and the spheres

Theorem C · \(\mathrm{SL}_{2n}/\mathrm{Sp}_{2n}\), \(n\ge2\)Proved, \(\operatorname{char}F=0\)

\(X=\mathrm{SL}_{2n}/\mathrm{Sp}_{2n}\), \(n\ge2\), \(\operatorname{char}F=0\). Then

$$\boxed{\ \mathcal H_I\cdot\varphi_0\subsetneq C_I :\ }$$

IG fails at the level of functions, including for \(\mathrm{SL}_4/\mathrm{Sp}_4\), where the paper proves spherical generation for sheaves. By \(\mathrm{SL}_4/\mathrm{Sp}_4\cong\mathrm{Spin}_6/\mathrm{Spin}_5\), the sphere family \(\mathrm{Spin}_{2n}/\mathrm{Spin}_{2n-1}\) fails for \(n=2\) (the group \(\mathrm{SL}_2\)) and \(n=3\).

Proof

Proof (restriction of the Speh witness, no irreducibility needed)

  • \(X(F)=\mathrm{SL}_{2n}(F)/\mathrm{Sp}_{2n}(F)\) since \(H^1(F,\mathrm{Sp}_{2n})=1\) (Kneser). Let \(\pi_n\) be the Speh witness of Tool 4 for \(\mathrm{GL}_{2n}\) and \(\pi:=\pi_n|_{\mathrm{SL}_{2n}(F)}\), admissible of finite length. The \(\mathrm{Sp}_{2n}\)-invariant functional on \(\tilde\pi_n\) restricts to one on \(\tilde\pi\), so by Frobenius reciprocity (\(\mathrm{Sp}_{2n}\) reductive, \(\pi\) admissible) there is a nonzero \(\mathrm{SL}_{2n}(F)\)-map \(f:\mathcal S(X)\to\pi\); let \(\pi'\ne0\) be its image.
  • \(\pi'^{I'}\ne0\) for \(I'=I\cap\mathrm{SL}_{2n}\): every irreducible constituent of \(\pi\) is a subquotient of the restriction to \(\mathrm{SL}_{2n}\) of an unramified principal series of \(\mathrm{GL}_{2n}\), which is an unramified principal series of \(\mathrm{SL}_{2n}\), so by Borel's theorem it has nonzero \(I'\)-fixed vectors; in particular the subrepresentation \(\pi'\) does. And \(f(C_{I'})=f(e_{I'}\mathcal S(X))=e_{I'}\pi'=\pi'^{I'}\ne0\).
  • \(\pi^{K'}=0\) for \(K'=\mathrm{SL}_{2n}(\mathcal O)\): \(K/K'\simeq\mathcal O^\times\) via \(\det\) acts on the finite-dimensional \(\pi_n^{K'}\); a nonzero \(v\) with \(kv=\chi(\det k)v\) (\(\chi\) a character of \(\mathcal O^\times\), extended to \(\tilde\chi\) of \(F^\times\)) is a \(K\)-fixed vector of \(\pi_n\otimes\tilde\chi^{-1}\circ\det\), which is then a subquotient of an unramified principal series; but it is also a subquotient of \(\chi_1\tilde\chi^{-1}\times\dots\times\chi_{2n}\tilde\chi^{-1}\) with all \(\chi_i\) unramified, and the cuspidal support is unique up to permutation, so \(\tilde\chi\) is unramified, \(\chi=1\), and \(v\in\pi_n^K=0\).
  • So \(f|_{C_{I'}}:C_{I'}\to\pi'^{I'}\) is a nonzero \(\mathcal H_{I'}\)-map with \(f(\varphi_0)\in\pi'^{K'}=0\): Lemma C(1) of the Iwahori pages.

Open cases.

3 · Rank one: \(\mathrm{SL}_2/T\) against \(\mathrm{PGL}_2/T\), and non-split tori

The rank-one note proves \(Q_X\ne0\) and the failure of SG for \(T\backslash\mathrm{SL}_2\); this section checks both against the tree and against the paper's table, which lists \(\mathrm{SL}_2/\mathrm{SO}_2\) (\(=\mathrm{SL}_2/T\) over \(\mathbb C\)) as the one family where \(Z_{G^\theta}(S)=\{\pm1\}\) is disconnected and (H1)–(H5) fail.

Proposition D · Rank oneProved

\(T\) the diagonal torus, \(q\) odd. Let \(d(v)\) be the distance of a vertex \(v\) of the tree from the apartment \(A_T\), and \(k(v)\) the position on \(A_T\) of its projection.

  1. \(\mathrm{PGL}_2/T\) (same function spaces as \(\mathrm{GL}_2/T\)): \(K\backslash X(F)=\{d\ge0\}\). SG holds; IG fails and \(Q_X\ne0\) (Proposition F, Theorem A).
  2. \(\mathrm{SL}_2/T\): \(K\backslash X(F)=\{(d,\ k\bmod2,\ \epsilon)\}\) with \(\epsilon\in\mathbb F_q^\times/\mathbb F_q^{\times2}\) present for \(d\ge1\): two orbits with \(d=0\) and four for each \(d\ge1\). SG fails: \(\mathcal H_K\cdot\varphi_0\) is supported on the orbits with \(k\equiv d\pmod2\) and is constant in \(\epsilon\). IG fails and \(Q_X\ne0\): Theorem A, or Shtotland's Proposition 9.1, which exhibits the sign character as a direct summand of \(\mathcal S(X)^I\) (the note's functional \(\lambda(z_0)=1,\lambda(z_1)=-1\), zero on the \(x_w,y_w\), is the projection to it, and the relations it uses are Proposition 9.2, stated for \(q\equiv3\bmod4\)).
Proof

Proof of the orbit counts and of SG

  • \(K\backslash G(F)/T(F)\) is the set of \(T(F)\)-orbits on vertices. For \(\mathrm{PGL}_2\): \(T(F)/T(\mathcal O)\simeq\mathbb Z\) acts on \(A_T\) by all translations; \(T(\mathcal O)=\mathcal O^\times\) fixes \(A_T\) and acts on the vertices at distance \(d\) from \(A_T\) above a fixed apartment vertex, which are the \([x:1]\in\mathbb P^1(\mathcal O/\varpi^d)\) with \(x\) a unit, by \(x\mapsto ux\): transitively. One orbit per \(d\). The Hecke operator \(T_1=\mathbf 1_{K\operatorname{diag}(\varpi,1)K}\) on functions of \(d\) is \((T_1f)(0)=2f(0)+(q-1)f(1)\), \((T_1f)(d)=f(d-1)+qf(d+1)\) for \(d\ge1\); so \(\mathbf 1_{\{d\}}\in\mathbb C[T_1]\cdot\mathbf 1_{\{0\}}\) by induction and SG holds. (The central part of \(\mathcal H_K(\mathrm{GL}_2)\) acts trivially on \(X\).)
  • For \(\mathrm{SL}_2\): \(T(F)=\{\operatorname{diag}(a,a^{-1})\}\) translates \(A_T\) by \(2\operatorname{val}a\), leaving two orbits of apartment vertices (\(k\) even, \(k\) odd), and \(T(\mathcal O)\) acts on the units \(x\) by \(x\mapsto u^2x\), with two orbits on \((\mathcal O/\varpi^d)^\times\) for \(q\) odd and every \(d\ge1\). \(X(\mathcal O)\) is the orbit \((0,0)\). Two independent reasons for the failure of SG. Parity: \(\mathrm{SL}_2(F)\) preserves the parity of vertices, so \(Kt^\lambda K\cdot p\) for an even apartment vertex \(p\) is a sphere of even radius \(2a\), whose vertices satisfy \(|k-k_p|+d=2a\); every Hecke translate of \(\varphi_0\) is supported on \(\{k\equiv d\bmod2\}\), and the orbit \((d,k)=(0,1)\) is never reached. Square classes: \(\operatorname{diag}(u,1)\in\mathrm{GL}_2(\mathcal O)\), \(u\) a non-square unit, normalizes \(K\), \(T\) and every \(Kt^\lambda K\) and fixes \(\varphi_0\), so every element of \(\mathcal H_K\cdot\varphi_0\) is \(\operatorname{diag}(u,1)\)-invariant, while \(\operatorname{diag}(u,1)\) exchanges \((d,k,+)\) and \((d,k,-)\) for \(d\ge1\).
  • Dictionary with the paper: over \(\mathbb C\) there are no square classes and \(T(\mathcal O)\) is transitive on each branch, so the \(K\)-orbits on \(LX\) are \((d,k\bmod2)\leftrightarrow m=2d+(k\bmod2)\in\Lambda_S^+=\mathbb Z_{\ge0}\); the orbits with \(m\) odd are the ones the paper's \(\varphi(\Lambda_T^+)=2\mathbb Z\) misses (“misses \(\check\alpha\)”), and the parity argument above is the function-level form of that failure. The square-class splitting is a residue-field phenomenon with no sheaf counterpart.

Non-split tori (outside the paper's split class, inside Shtotland's). For the unramified anisotropic torus \(T_u=E^\times/F^\times\subseteq K=\mathrm{PGL}_2(\mathcal O)\): \(T_u\) fixes the vertex \(v_0\) of \(\mathcal O_E\) and acts transitively on each sphere about it (units of \(\mathcal O_E/\varpi^n\) are the primitive vectors of \((\mathcal O/\varpi^n)^2\)), hence on the edges at each distance, so \(T_u\backslash G/I=K\backslash G/I\); pullback along \(T_u\backslash G\to K\backslash G\) (proper, \(K/T_u\) compact) identifies \(C_c(T_u\backslash G)^I\) with \(C_c(K\backslash G)^I=\mathbf 1_K\mathcal H_I\) as \(\mathcal H_I\)-modules, with \(\mathbf 1_{T_uK}\mapsto\mathbf 1_K\): SG and IG hold. This is the note's Section 7.1, verified. For the ramified torus \(T_r=F(\sqrt\varpi)^\times/F^\times\), which fixes the midpoint of an edge, the note poses the question; it is open here.

4 · Non-homogeneous: \(\mathbb A^n\) holds, \(M_n\) fails

\(X=\mathbb A^n\) under \(\mathrm{GL}_n\): SG and IG hold for every \(n\), \(Q_X=0\) (𝔸ⁿ, generation at both levels). The other non-homogeneous example of the paper is Godement–Jacquet.

Proposition E · \(M_n\) under \(\mathrm{GL}_n\times\mathrm{GL}_n\)Proved

\(X=M_n\) under \(G=\mathrm{GL}_n\times\mathrm{GL}_n\), \((g_1,g_2)\cdot x=g_1xg_2^{-1}\), \(n\ge2\), \(K=K_n\times K_n\), \(I=I_n\times I_n\), \(\varphi_0=\mathbf 1_{M_n(\mathcal O)}\). Then SG holds and IG fails, \(Q_X\ne0\), with witness \(\mathrm{St}_n\boxtimes\mathrm{St}_n\): the Steinberg obstruction of the group case survives the boundary of singular matrices.

Proof
  • SG. \(K\)-orbits on \(M_n(F)\) are the elementary-divisor classes, including singular ones; \(C_K\) is spanned by their indicators. The function \(\mathbf 1_{K t^\lambda K}\ast\varphi_0\) (\(\lambda\) dominant) is supported on \(Kt^\lambda K\cdot M_n(\mathcal O)=\{x:\text{elementary divisors}\ \ge\lambda\ \text{coordinatewise}\}\), a closed union of orbits with \(t^\lambda\) on top, and is nonzero on \(Kt^\lambda K\) (constant there): by induction along the dominance order, every orbit indicator is reached. (This is the function-level shadow of the paper's \(M_n\) example.)
  • IG. Godement–Jacquet (LNM 260, §3): for \(\Phi\in\mathcal S(M_n(F))\) and a matrix coefficient \(c_{v,\tilde v}(g)=\langle\pi(g)v,\tilde v\rangle\) of an irreducible \(\pi\), \(Z(s,\Phi,c)=\int_{\mathrm{GL}_n(F)}\Phi(g)c(g)|\det g|^{s+(n-1)/2}dg\) converges for \(\operatorname{Re}s\gg0\), \(Z/L(s,\pi)\in\mathbb C[q^{\pm s}]\), and these quotients span \(\mathbb C[q^{\pm s}]\) (the \(L\)-factor generates the ideal of the zeta integrals). The substitution \(g=g_1hg_2^{-1}\) gives \(Z(s,(g_1,g_2)\Phi,c_{v,\tilde v})=|\det g_1|^{s'}|\det g_2|^{-s'}Z(s,\Phi,c_{\pi(g_2^{-1})v,\tilde\pi(g_1^{-1})\tilde v})\), \(s'=s+(n-1)/2\). At \(s'=0\) the bilinear form \(B(\Phi,v\otimes\tilde v):=(Z/L)|_{s'=0}\) is nonzero and invariant for \(G\) acting on \(\tilde\pi\boxtimes\pi\) by \(\tilde\pi(g_1)\otimes\pi(g_2)\); so \(\Phi\mapsto B(\Phi,\cdot)\) is a nonzero \(G\)-map \(\mathcal S(M_n)\to\pi\boxtimes\tilde\pi\).
  • Take \(\pi=\mathrm{St}_n\): the target \(\mathrm{St}_n\boxtimes\mathrm{St}_n\) is irreducible, \(I\)-fixed line \(\mathrm{St}_n^{I_n}\otimes\mathrm{St}_n^{I_n}\), no \(K\)-fixed vector. Tool 1. In the language of the group case: the sign character \(\varepsilon\otimes\varepsilon\) of \(\mathcal H_{I_n}\otimes\mathcal H_{I_n}^{\mathrm{op}}=\mathcal S(\mathrm{GL}_n)^{I}\) extends along \(\mathcal S(\mathrm{GL}_n)^I\subseteq\mathcal S(M_n)^I\) through the zeta integral, whereas the Steinberg functional of \(\mathbb A^2\setminus0\) does not extend over the origin (𝔸ⁿ, why the origin matters).

5 · Status

Table 1. · Function level, all cases examined; “paper” refers to the sheaf-level results of mainv2.tex on spherical generation.
\(X\)SGIGwitness / reason
group \(H\), \(W\ne1\)holdsfails, \(Q_X\ne0\)\(\mathrm{St}_H\boxtimes\mathrm{St}_H\) (E; Theorem A)
\(M_n\) under \(\mathrm{GL}_n\times\mathrm{GL}_n\), \(n\ge2\)holdsfails, \(Q_X\ne0\)\(\mathrm{St}_n\boxtimes\mathrm{St}_n\) via Godement–Jacquet (E)
\(\mathbb A^n\) under \(\mathrm{GL}_n\)holdsholds, \(Q_X=0\)lattice chain (𝔸ⁿ pages)
\(\mathrm{GL}_2/\mathrm{Sp}_2=\mathbb G_m\)holdsholds\(I\backslash X=K\backslash X\)
\(\mathrm{GL}_{2n}/\mathrm{Sp}_{2n}\), \(n\ge2\)paper: \(n=2\) (\(\mathrm{SL}_4\)); open \(n\ge3\)fails (\(\operatorname{char}0\))Speh \(U(\mathrm{St}_2,2)\times\mathbf 1_{\mathrm{GL}_2}^{n-2}\) (G)
\(\mathrm{SL}_{2n}/\mathrm{Sp}_{2n}\), \(n\ge2\)paper: \(n=2\); open \(n\ge3\)fails (\(\operatorname{char}0\))Speh restricted (Theorem C)
\(\mathrm{GL}_{2p}/(\mathrm{GL}_p\times\mathrm{GL}_p)\)holds (paper)fails, \(Q_X\ne0\)\(\mathrm{St}_{2p}\) (Shalika), \(\mathrm{St}_{2p}\otimes\chi_0\) (B(i))
\(\mathrm{GL}_3/(\mathrm{GL}_1\times\mathrm{GL}_2)\)holds (paper)fails, \(Q_X\ne0\)\(\mathrm{St}_2\times\mathbf 1\) (B(ii))
\(\mathrm{GL}_n/(\mathrm{GL}_p\times\mathrm{GL}_q)\), \(q-p\ge1\), \(n\ge4\)holds (paper)opencandidate \(\mathrm{St}_{2p}\times\mathbf 1_{\mathrm{GL}_{q-p}}\) (B(iii))
\(\mathrm{PGL}_2/T\), \(\mathrm{GL}_2/T\)holdsfails, \(Q_X\ne0\)\(\mathrm{St}_2\) (F; D(i))
\(\mathrm{SL}_2/T\)failsfails, \(Q_X\ne0\)parity and square classes; sign summand (D(ii))
\(\mathrm{Spin}_{2n}/\mathrm{Spin}_{2n-1}\)holds (paper)\(n=2,3\) fail; \(n\ge4\) open\(\mathrm{SL}_2\) group; \(\mathrm{SL}_4/\mathrm{Sp}_4\); candidates in 2
\(E_6/F_4\)open (paper)openSteinberg silent; candidates in 2
\(\mathrm{PGL}_2/T_u\) (unramified torus; a form)holdsholds\(T_u\backslash G/I=K\backslash G/I\) (3)

Pattern. Among the paper's homogeneous families, IG fails wherever it has been decided, by a Steinberg (quasi-split \(X\)), a Speh (symplectic \(X\)) or an induced-Steinberg witness; the only positive homogeneous case is the torus-like \(\mathbb G_m\). The positive non-homogeneous case \(\mathbb A^n\) is positive because its only quotients with Iwahori-fixed vectors come from the horospherical open orbit and do not extend over the origin, while \(M_n\) keeps the group's Steinberg quotient.

Open. \(\mathrm{GL}_n/(\mathrm{GL}_p\times\mathrm{GL}_q)\) with \(q>p\), \(n\ge4\) (is \(\mathrm{St}_{2p}\times\mathbf 1_{\mathrm{GL}_{q-p}}\) distinguished?); spheres \(n\ge4\) and \(E_6/F_4\) (compute \(Q_X\) with Shtotland's presentation, or find a distinguished Iwahori-spherical non-spherical representation); the ramified torus.

Literature and the rank-one notepapers checked on F1 · what the note contributes