§14 · Agent X4 · Sakellaridis's theorem · 2026-10-17T21:18:34Z
Proposition X4.7 · \(\operatorname{im}r=\{g:g(y_1)=g(\sigma y_1)\}\), of codimension one, every \(q\)
proved correction ★ key step
Proves, by exact identities in \(q^{1/2}\), that the image of Sakellaridis's restriction map for \(E_6/F_4\) is precisely the subring of invariants that agree at the two glued points, of codimension one; the target has only constant units, so it is cyclic over the Hecke algebra iff \(r\) is onto, which fails, and it needs exactly two generators. This is pure algebra about \(r\) and uses none of Sakellaridis's hypotheses.
Proposition X4.7.
Notation of Computation 6.4 and Theorem 6.6: \(S:=\mathbb C[\Lambda_S]^{W_X}\) (the target of \(r\) after translating \(\delta(X)^{1/2}A_X^*\) to \(A_X^*\)), \(r(f)(y)=f(q^{\rho_L}y)\), \(R:=\operatorname{im}r\), \(M_\kappa\) the \(W_X\)-orbit sums, \(\sigma\) the diagram automorphism (\(M_{(a,b)}\mapsto M_{(b,a)}\)), \(P:=M_{(3,0)}+M_{(0,3)}\), \(y_1=(q^{-5},q)\), \(\xi:=W\cdot q^{\rho_L}y_1=W\cdot q^{\rho-\omega_4}\in A^*/W\), and $$\mathcal K:=\{g\in S:\ g(y_1)=g(\sigma y_1)\}.$$ For every real \(q>1\):
- \(S^\sigma=\mathbb C[M_{(1,1)},P]\), a polynomial ring, and \(S=S^\sigma\oplus S^\sigma\,(M_{(3,0)}-M_{(0,3)})\).
- \(S^\sigma\subseteq R\).
- \(R=\mathcal K=S^\sigma\oplus\mathfrak n\,(M_{(3,0)}-M_{(0,3)})\), where \(\mathfrak n=(M_{(1,1)}-M_{(1,1)}(y_1),\,P-P(y_1))\) is the maximal ideal of \(S^\sigma\) at \(y_1\). Hence \(S=R\oplus\mathbb C\,M_{(3,0)}\), and \(S/R\simeq\mathbb C\) with \(\mathbb C[A^*]^W\) acting by \(f\mapsto f(q^{\rho-\omega_4})\).
- \(S^\times=\mathbb C^\times\). Consequently \(S\) is cyclic as a \(\mathbb C[A^*]^W\)-module (acting through \(r\)) iff \(r\) is onto, which is false; \(S=R\cdot1+R\cdot M_{(3,0)}\), so the minimal number of generators is exactly \(2\); and \(\dim_{\mathbb C}S/\mathfrak m_\xi S=2\).
Write \(t=q^{1/2}\) and \(c_8:=q^{-3}+q^{-2}+q^{-1}+2+q+q^2+q^3\).
- \(S^\sigma\). \(\sigma\) acts on \(\Lambda_S\) as \(-w_0\) (Computation 6.4(5)), so \(\langle W_X,\sigma\rangle=W_X\times\{\pm1\}\), the Weyl group of \(G_2\) acting on \(\Lambda_S\) with short roots \(W_X(1,1)\) and long roots \(\pm(3,0),\pm(0,3),\pm(3,-3)\). \(\Lambda_S\) is spanned by the short roots, so it is the root lattice of \(G_2\), which equals its weight lattice; the fundamental weights are \((1,1)\) and \((3,0)\), with \(W(G_2)\)-orbit sums \(M_{(1,1)}\) and \(P\). By Bourbaki, Lie VI §3.4, Thm. 1, \(S^\sigma=\mathbb C[M_{(1,1)},P]\) with \(M_{(1,1)},P\) algebraically independent.
- \(S\) over \(S^\sigma\). \(S\) is generated by \(M_{(1,1)},M_{(3,0)},M_{(0,3)}\) (Lemma 6.2, Computation 6.4(4)). With \(M_{(0,3)}=P-M_{(3,0)}\), \(M_{(3,0)}M_{(0,3)}=M_{(3,3)}+3\in S^\sigma\) and \(M_{(3,0)}^2=P\,M_{(3,0)}-M_{(3,0)}M_{(0,3)}\), we get \(S=S^\sigma+S^\sigma M_{(3,0)}=S^\sigma+S^\sigma(M_{(3,0)}-M_{(0,3)})\); splitting into \(\sigma\)-eigenspaces gives the direct sum, with \(S^-=S^\sigma(M_{(3,0)}-M_{(0,3)})\).
- \(S^\sigma\subseteq R\). Exact expansions: \(r(m_{\omega_2^\vee})=c_8M_{(1,1)}+c_0\) (Computation 6.4(6)); \(M_{(1,1)}^2=M_{(2,2)}+2P+2M_{(1,1)}+6\); and \(r(m_{\omega_1^\vee+\omega_6^\vee})=M_{(2,2)}+c_8P+d_1M_{(1,1)}+d_0\) with Laurent polynomials \(c_0,d_1,d_0\) in \(t\). So \(r(m_{\omega_1^\vee+\omega_6^\vee})-M_{(1,1)}^2=(c_8-2)P+(d_1-2)M_{(1,1)}+(d_0-6)\) with \(c_8-2=q^{-3}+q^{-2}+q^{-1}+q+q^2+q^3>0\). As \(R\) is a ring, \(M_{(1,1)},P\in R\), hence \(S^\sigma\subseteq R\).
- Odd part. \(r\circ\sigma^*=\sigma^*\circ r\) and \(\sigma^*\) preserves \(\mathbb C[A^*]^W\) (Computation 6.4(5)), so \(R\) is \(\sigma\)-stable and \(R=S^\sigma\oplus(R\cap S^-)\), \(R\cap S^-=I\,(M_{(3,0)}-M_{(0,3)})\) for the ideal \(I:=\{a\in S^\sigma:a(M_{(3,0)}-M_{(0,3)})\in R\}\).
- \(I\subseteq\mathfrak n\). By Theorem 6.6, \(R\subseteq\mathcal K\). For \(a\in S^\sigma\), \(g=a(M_{(3,0)}-M_{(0,3)})\) has \(g(y_1)-g(\sigma y_1)=2a(y_1)(M_{(3,0)}-M_{(0,3)})(y_1)\), and \((M_{(3,0)}-M_{(0,3)})(y_1)=q^6+q^3+q^{-9}-q^9-q^{-3}-q^{-6}\ne0\) for \(q>1\). So \(a(y_1)=0\).
- \(\mathfrak n\subseteq I\). Exact identities in \(t\) (c6_image.py):
with \(c=q^{-9}+q^{-6}+q^{-3}+2+q^3+q^6+q^9\) (the coefficient in \(r(m_{3\omega_1^\vee})=M_{(6,0)}+c\,M_{(0,3)}\), Computation 6.5) and \(d\) the coefficient of \(M_{(0,3)}\) in \(r(m_{\omega_1^\vee+\omega_3^\vee})\); they use \(M_{(1,1)}M_{(3,0)}=M_{(4,1)}+M_{(2,2)}+M_{(1,1)}\) and \(M_{(3,0)}^2=M_{(6,0)}+2M_{(0,3)}\). Both left sides lie in \(R\), so \(c_8M_{(1,1)}-d\) and \(P+2-c\) lie in \(I\subseteq\mathfrak n\). Evaluating at \(y_1\) gives \(d=c_8M_{(1,1)}(y_1)\) and \(c-2=P(y_1)\), so \(M_{(1,1)}-M_{(1,1)}(y_1)\in I\) and \(P-P(y_1)\in I\). Since \(S^\sigma\) is a polynomial ring in \(M_{(1,1)},P\), these generate \(\mathfrak n\): \(I=\mathfrak n\).
- \(R=\mathcal K\). For \(g=a+b(M_{(3,0)}-M_{(0,3)})\), \(g\in\mathcal K\iff b(y_1)=0\). So \(\mathcal K=S^\sigma\oplus\mathfrak n(M_{(3,0)}-M_{(0,3)})=R\). As \(P\in R\), \(S=R\oplus\mathbb C(M_{(3,0)}-M_{(0,3)})=R\oplus\mathbb CM_{(3,0)}\). The functional \(g\mapsto g(y_1)-g(\sigma y_1)\) identifies \(S/R\) with \(\mathbb C\), and \(r(f)g\mapsto f(q^{\rho_L}y_1)\,(g(y_1)-g(\sigma y_1))\) because \(r(f)(y_1)=r(f)(\sigma y_1)\); \(q^{\rho_L}y_1=q^{\lambda_1^*}\) is \(W\)-conjugate to \(q^{\rho-\omega_4}\) (Theorem 6.6).
- Units and cyclicity. A unit of \(S\) is a unit of \(\mathbb C[\Lambda_S]\), i.e. \(cy^\kappa\); \(W_X\)-invariance forces \(\kappa\) to be \(S_3\)-fixed, so \(\kappa=0\). If \(S=R\,s\), then \(1=r(f)s\) makes \(s\) a unit, \(s\in\mathbb C^\times\), and \(S=R\): contradiction with 7. \(S=R+RM_{(3,0)}\) gives two generators. Fibre: \(y_1\) and \(\sigma y_1\) are not \(W_X\)-conjugate (Theorem 6.6), so they give distinct maximal ideals of \(S\) containing \(\mathfrak m_\xi S\) (\(\mathfrak m_\xi\subseteq\mathbb C[A^*]^W\) the ideal of \(\xi\)); by the Chinese remainder theorem \(\dim S/\mathfrak m_\xi S\ge2\), and \(\le2\) because \(S=R+RM_{(3,0)}\) and \(R/\mathfrak m_\xi R=\mathbb C\).
This proves the conjecture of Conjecture 6.8 (\(\operatorname{im}r=\mathcal K\)) without the unramifiedness check it left open. Only the algebra of \(r\) is used: no hypothesis of Sakellaridis enters.
Builds on
- Setup 6.1 · Conventions for Sakellaridis's restriction map \(r\), calibrated on Proposition F; the sign of the shift is irrelevant
- Lemma 6.2 · Two criteria for the surjectivity of \(r\): monoid generators suffice, and a glued pair of points forbids it
- Computation 6.4 · \(E_6/F_4\): root data, the shift \(q^{\rho_L}\), the little Weyl group \(S_3\), and the three generators of the target
- Computation 6.5 · \(E_6/F_4\): in every computed window the image of \(r\) has codimension one, cut out by a \(\sigma\)-odd functional
- Theorem 6.6 · \(E_6/F_4\): two points of the shifted torus that are not \(W_X\)-conjugate are \(W(E_6)\)-conjugate, so \(r\) is not onto and (SG) fails under (A1)–(A5)Sakellaridis's standing assumptions for his Theorem 8.0.2 (the pages' Theorem E): (A1) a characteristic-0 field and a split group with simply connected derived group; (A2) an integral model of X with a smooth open Borel orbit and invariant measures; (A3a) rank-one models over O, (A3b) the Cartan decomposition, (A3c) Iwahori orbits (his Axioms 2.2.1, 2.4.1, 2.4.2); (A4) conditions on the spherical roots and colours; (A5) X homogeneous and affine with one open Borel orbit.
Built on by
- Corollary X4.8 · Under Theorem 8.0.2, \(C_K\) is not cyclic and needs exactly two generators
- Summary X4.9 · \(E_6/F_4\) function cell: two generators, modulo (E) and (I)
- Summary X4.14 · \(E_6/F_4\) function cell: two generators, modulo Axiom 2.2.1Sakellaridis's Axiom 2.2.1, relabelled (A3a): rank-one models over O. For E6/F4 it holds over every O with 2 invertible (VI run). over \(\mathcal O\)
- Re-check V5 · Re-check by V5
- Summary 9.6 · Verdict after the repairs: every input held or repaired; \(E_6/F_4\) still the one divergence
Sources
- Bourbaki, Lie VI §3.4 Thm 1 (invariants of W on the weight lattice)
- families/e6-f4.html; data.json steps Setup 6.1 … Theorem 6.6