History · page 1 of 3

History: how \(\Esix/\Ffour\) got its shape

Five strands meet in \(\Esix/\Ffour\): a non-associative algebra, two exceptional groups, a Jordan algebra, Cartan's symmetric spaces, and Borel orbits. Each event says what was blocked, what was found, and where these pages develop it.

1843–1845 · octonions
Obstacle
After Hamilton's quaternions (1843), is there an 8-dimensional number system?
Advance
Graves found the octonions in December 1843; Cayley published them in 1845. Hamilton pointed out to Graves in July 1844 that they are not associative.
Left open
Whether non-associative numbers could support geometry or groups.
Example, picture
The Fano plane of multiplication rules, \(e_ie_{i+1}=e_{i+3}\).
Sources
[Baez, §1, p. 2], [Cayley 1845], [Graves 1845]
Developed in
quaternions and octonions (the full story, the Fano plane), Albert algebra, octonions
1887–1894 · exceptional Lie algebras
Obstacle
Classify the simple Lie algebras over \(\C\).
Advance
Killing (letter to Engel, October 1887) and Cartan (thesis, 1894) found four classical families and five exceptions, among them \(\esix\) (dim 78) and \(\ffour\) (dim 52).
Left open
What the exceptions are symmetries of.
Sources
[Baez, §4]
Developed in
the groups \(\Esix\supset\Ffour\)
1926–1927 · symmetric spaces
Obstacle
Classify Riemannian spaces with a geodesic symmetry at every point.
Advance
Cartan classified them (in modern terms, by involutions \(\theta\) of simple Lie algebras); \(\Esix/\Ffour\) is his type EIV, of rank 2.
Left open
A uniform description of the root data of all types.
Example, picture
\(\SL_3/\SO_3\) as positive-definite matrices of determinant 1.
Sources
[Cartan 1926, 1927]
Developed in
\(\SL_3/\SO_3\), the involution
1934 · the Albert algebra
Obstacle
Jordan, von Neumann and Wigner classified the algebras of quantum observables (formally real Jordan algebras), with one case left unexplained.
Advance
The exception is \(\mathfrak h_3(\Oc)\); Albert proved it is not a subalgebra of any associative algebra with \(\tfrac12(xy+yx)\).
Left open
Its symmetry groups.
Sources
[JNW], [Albert], [Baez, §3]
Developed in
Albert algebra, physics
1950 · \(\ffour\) and \(\esix\) from \(\Jalg\)
Obstacle
Realize \(\ffour\) and \(\esix\) concretely.
Advance
Chevalley and Schafer: \(\ffour=\Der(\Jalg)\) and \(\esix=\Der(\Jalg)\oplus\{\text{multiplications by traceless }Y\}\). This is the decomposition \(\kf\oplus\pf\) of the Proposition.
Sources
[CS]
Developed in
Proof of (b)
1954–1966 · the magic square
Obstacle
Explain all exceptional Lie algebras by octonions.
Advance
Freudenthal and Tits built a \(4\times4\) square of Lie algebras from pairs of division algebras. Its first row \(\so_3,\mathfrak{su}_3,\mathfrak{sp}_3,\ffour\) gives the groups \(K\) and its second row \(\mathfrak{su}_3,\mathfrak{su}_3^{\oplus2},\mathfrak{su}_6,\esix\) the groups \(G\) of the \(A_2\) row (compact forms).
Sources
[Freudenthal], [Tits], [Baez, §4.3, Table 5]
Developed in
the \(A_2\) row
1960–1962 · restricted roots and Satake diagrams
Obstacle
Read off the root data of a symmetric space from the root system of \(G\).
Advance
Satake and Araki: color the Dynkin diagram (black nodes = roots of \(\mf\)); the white nodes give the restricted root system and multiplicities.
Example, picture
EIV: four black nodes (\(D_4\)), two white ones (\(A_2\), multiplicity 8).
Sources
[Satake], [Araki]
Developed in
the Satake diagram
1974 · symmetric varieties are spherical
Obstacle
Which irreducible \(G\)-modules contain \(K\)-fixed vectors?
Advance
Vust proved that \(K^\circ P\) is open in \(G\) for suitable parabolics, giving Borel subgroups with an open orbit on \(G/K\).
Left open
The general theory of spherical varieties (Luna–Vust and later).
Sources
[Vust], [Pezzini]
Developed in
Spherical
2004–2007 · orbits over any field
Obstacle
Orbits of the norm-preserving group on \(\mathfrak h_3(C)\) over general fields, for Bhargava-style composition laws.
Advance
Krutelevich: over the split octonions the orbits are classified by rank, and elements of rank 3 with a given norm form one orbit. Over \(\C\) this is transitivity on \(\Xe\).
Sources
[Krutelevich, Prop. 12]
Developed in
Proof of (a)