History · page 3 of 3

Octonions and \(\Esix\) in physics

Physics met these objects four times: as quantum observables, as symmetries of particles, as the shape of supersymmetry, and as the moduli of supergravity, where \(\Esix/\Ffour\) itself appears. Only the last two are established mathematical physics; attempts to derive the Standard Model are open research programmes.

Roadmap of this page

SummaryWhat does physics actually use?

Table 1. Where the objects of these pages appear, and the status of each use.
objectrolestatus
\(\mathfrak h_3(\Oc)\)the one exceptional algebra of observables (1934)theorem
\(\R,\C,\Ha,\Oc\)supersymmetry in spacetime dimensions \(3,4,6,10\)theorem
\(E_{6(-26)}/\Ffour\)scalar manifold of the octonionic magical supergravity in 5 dimensionstheorem (model)
cubic norm \(\det\)black-hole entropy in 5 dimensionsderived in models
\(\Esix\), its 27grand unificationmodel, not confirmed
\(\mathfrak h_3(\Oc)\), \(\Ffour\), \(\Oc\)Standard Model gauge group, three generationsspeculative

Status labels describe the mathematics inside each physical model, not evidence that nature uses it. As Baez put it in 2002, “there is still no proof that the octonions are useful for understanding the real world” [Baez, §1, p. 3].

1934: algebras of observablesWhy did physicists define the Albert algebra?

Observables of a quantum system are self-adjoint operators, and the product of two of them is not self-adjoint, but \(X\jo Y=\tfrac12(XY+YX)\) is. Jordan, von Neumann and Wigner took this product as the axiom and classified the finite-dimensional formally real algebras: apart from matrix algebras with \(\tfrac12(XY+YX)\), only one remains [JNW]. Albert proved that this one, \(\mathfrak h_3(\Oc)\), is genuinely exceptional [Albert]. Octonionic quantum mechanics built on it had little success in nuclear and particle physics [Baez, §1, p. 2]; the algebra survived in mathematics as the Albert algebra of these pages.

1973–1976: quarks and grand unificationDo the symmetry groups of these pages act on particles?

These are models; their particle assignments are not confirmed by experiment.

Supersymmetry: dimensions \(3,4,6,10\)Where does the list \(\R,\C,\Ha,\Oc\) appear in spacetime?

[Baez–Huerta, abstract and §1] Proved (cited)

The classical superstring and super-Yang–Mills Lagrangians are supersymmetric if and only if spacetime has dimension \(3,4,6\) or \(10\), that is, \(2+\dim\K\) for \(\K=\R,\C,\Ha,\Oc\).

Baez and Huerta prove the “if” direction with division algebras (§6) and credit the dimension count to earlier physics literature; Kugo and Townsend had tied spinors in these dimensions to \(\R,\C,\Ha,\Oc\) through \(\SL(2,\K)\) [KT]. The mechanism is visible on the \(\SL_2/\SO_2\) page: \(2\times2\) Hermitian matrices over \(\K\) form a space of dimension \(2+\dim\K\), and their determinant is a Minkowski form,

\[\det\begin{pmatrix}t+x&\bar w\\ w&t-x\end{pmatrix}=t^2-x^2-\Nm(w),\qquad w\in\K,\]

so \(\SL(2,\K)\) acts on spacetime of dimension \(2+\dim\K\) by Lorentz transformations: \(\slf(2,\R)\cong\so(2,1)\), …, \(\slf(2,\Oc)\cong\so(9,1)\) [Baez, §1, p. 3]. For \(\K=\R\) this is exactly the hyperboloid of picture (a). The same list \(1,2,4,8\) is the multiplicity \(\mult\) of the \(A_2\) row.

Magical supergravity: \(\Esix/\Ffour\) as a space of fieldsWhere does \(\Esix/\Ffour\) itself appear?

Günaydin, Sierra and Townsend classified the 5-dimensional \(N=2\) supergravities whose scalar fields form a symmetric space, by Jordan algebras of degree 3; four exceptional, “magical”, cases come from \(\mathfrak h_3(\K)\), \(\K=\R,\C,\Ha,\Oc\) [GST 1983], [GST 1984]. In these theories the scalar fields take values in the hypersurface where the cubic norm equals one [FG, §4, pp. 9–10]:

\[\{X\in\mathfrak h_3(\K):\ \det X=1,\ X\text{ with three positive eigenvalues}\}.\]

For \(\K=\Oc\) this is \(E_{6(-26)}/\Ffour\), the real, Riemannian form of the variety \(\Xe\cong\Esix/\Ffour\) of these pages (see octonions over \(\C\)). The four magical theories are the four members of the \(A_2\) row, read over \(\R\).

Black holes and orbits of \(\Esix\)What does the cubic determinant measure?

In these 5-dimensional theories a black hole carries charges \(X\) in the Jordan algebra, and its entropy is \(\sqrt{|\det X|}\) [FG, abstract and §4]. Ferrara and Günaydin classify the charge orbits by how many eigenvalues vanish, as the \(\SL_3/\SO_3\) page does for symmetric matrices.

Table 2. Orbits of charges for the split form \(E_{6(6)}\) acting on \(\mathfrak h_3\) of the split octonions [FG, §2, eqs. (2-8)–(2-10)].
vanishing eigenvalues\(\det X\)orbit
none\(\ne0\)\(E_{6(6)}/F_{4(4)}\)
one\(0\)\(E_{6(6)}/(\mathrm O(5,4)\ltimes T_{16})\)
two\(0\)\(E_{6(6)}/(\mathrm O(5,5)\ltimes T_{16})\), dim 17

In the maximal (\(N=8\)) theory, from string and M-theory, the algebra is built on the split octonions and the group is \(E_{6(6)}\) [FG, §2, p. 3]; the compact octonions and \(E_{6(-26)}\) belong to the magical \(N=2\) theory. Over \(\C\) both become the \(\Esix\) and \(\Jalg\) of these pages, and the generic orbit \(\{\det\ne0\}\) is, up to scaling, \(\Esix/\Ffour\).

Open programmes: the Standard ModelCould the Albert algebra explain the particles we see?

Several current research programmes propose that it might. None is established.

Claims in this section are taken from the abstracts of these papers. Speculative