§3 · Agent 3 · Hypotheses in char p · 2026-10-18T02:56:12Z
Proposition 3.2 · (A1)(A1) Field and group: F a non-archimedean local field of characteristic 0 (Sakellaridis §1.1), G split reductive over O with connected fibres and simply connected derived group (§1.7)., (A2)(A2) Integral model: X quasi-affine over O, its open Borel orbit smooth and surjective over O with B-homogeneous special fibre; a G-eigenmeasure on X and a B-invariant measure on the open orbit (§1.7). for \(\mathcal M_\theta\) over any complete DVR with 2 invertible
proved audit: correct
Proves the group and integral-model hypotheses of Sakellaridis's §1.7 for \(\mathcal M_\theta\) over \(\mathcal O=\mathbb F_q[[t]]\), \(p\) odd, by arguments valid over any complete discrete valuation ring in which 2 is a unit: \(H\) is smooth with connected fibres of type \(F_4\), \(X\) is smooth and quasi-affine, the open Borel orbit is \(U_P\times A_X\) over \(\mathcal O\), invariant forms exist and \(X(\mathcal O)=Kx_0\).
Proposition 3.2.
Let \(\mathcal O\) be a complete discrete valuation ring with \(2\in\mathcal O^\times\) and finite residue field \(\mathbb F_q\) (for instance \(\mathbb F_q[[t]]\), \(p\) odd), \(F\) its fraction field. Then:
- (A1)(A1) Field and group: F a non-archimedean local field of characteristic 0 (Sakellaridis §1.1), G split reductive over O with connected fibres and simply connected derived group (§1.7). \(G\) is split reductive over \(\mathcal O\) with connected fibres and simply connected derived group.
- \(H=G^\theta\) is a smooth closed subgroup scheme with \(\mathrm{Lie}\,H=\mathfrak g^\theta\) of rank 52; each geometric fibre of \(H\) is connected reductive of type \(F_4\), with maximal torus \(T^\theta=T_8\).
- \(X=G/H\) is represented by a smooth quasi-affine \(\mathcal O\)-scheme of relative dimension 26, and \(\tau:X\to G\) is a monomorphism.
- \(T^\theta=T_8\) is a split torus; \(B\cap H=B_L\cap\mathrm{Spin}_8=:B_8\) and \(P\cap H=\mathrm{Spin}_8\) scheme-theoretically; \((u,a)\mapsto uax_0\) is an open immersion \(U_P\times A_X\hookrightarrow X\) whose image is \(\mathring X:=X\smallsetminus\overline{(X\smallsetminus\mathring X_F)}\); \(\mathring X\) is smooth and surjective over \(\mathcal O\) and \(\mathring X_{\mathbb F_q}\) is one \(B_{\mathbb F_q}\)-orbit with smooth stabilizer.
- \(X\) carries a \(G\)-invariant relative volume form and \(\mathring X\) a \(B\)-invariant one, over \(\mathcal O\); their absolute values give a \(G(F)\)-invariant measure on \(X(F)\) and a \(B(F)\)-invariant measure on \(\mathring X(F)\).
- \(X(\mathcal O)=Kx_0\), so \(\varphi_0=\mathbf 1_{X(\mathcal O)}=\mathbf 1_{Kx_0}\).
In particular (A1)(A1) Field and group: F a non-archimedean local field of characteristic 0 (Sakellaridis §1.1), G split reductive over O with connected fibres and simply connected derived group (§1.7). and (A2)(A2) Integral model: X quasi-affine over O, its open Borel orbit smooth and surjective over O with B-homogeneous special fibre; a G-eigenmeasure on X and a B-invariant measure on the open orbit (§1.7). hold for \(\mathcal M_\theta\) over \(\mathbb F_q[[t]]\) for every odd \(p\), including \(p=3\).
- (A1)(A1) Field and group: F a non-archimedean local field of characteristic 0 (Sakellaridis §1.1), G split reductive over O with connected fibres and simply connected derived group (§1.7).. Chevalley–Demazure group scheme over \(\mathbb Z\), base-changed to \(\mathcal O\).
- Smoothness of \(H\). Let \(G':=G\rtimes(\mathbb Z/2)_{\mathcal O}\), the generator acting by \(\theta\) (an automorphism of order 2 over \(\mathbb Z\), S4-11). Since \(2\in\mathcal O^\times\), \((\mathbb Z/2)_{\mathcal O}\simeq\mu_{2,\mathcal O}\) is of multiplicative type, so by Conrad, Lemma 2.2.4, its centralizer \(Z_{G'}(\mu_2)\) is smooth with Lie algebra \(\mathrm{Lie}(G')^{\mu_2}\). An element \(g\varepsilon\) centralizes the generator iff \(\theta(g)=g\), so \(Z_{G'}(\mu_2)=H\times\mu_2\) and \(H\), the fibre over the identity section of the étale \(\mu_2\), is smooth with \(\mathrm{Lie}\,H=\mathfrak g^\theta\). Over \(\mathbb Z[1/2]\) the idempotent \((1+d\theta)/2\) splits \(\mathfrak g\), and the rank of \(\mathfrak g^\theta\) is \(4+24+24=52\): the \(+1\)-eigenspace of \(-w_L\) on \(\mathfrak t\) is the black coroot span; \(\theta\) is the identity on \(\mathrm{Spin}_8\) (S4-11); the 48 other roots form 24 orbits \(\{\beta,\theta\beta\}\) with \(\theta\beta\ne\beta\) (exact computation: the \(\theta\)-fixed roots are exactly \(\Phi_L\), no root has \(\theta\beta=-\beta\)).
- Fibres are \(F_4\) and connected. Let \(k\) be an algebraically closed field of characteristic \(\ne2\). (a) The character group of \(T^\theta=\ker(\theta-1)\) is \(X^*(T)/(1-\theta^*)X^*(T)\); the elementary divisors of \(1-\theta^*\) are \((1,1)\) (computed), so the quotient is free of rank 4: \(T^\theta\) is a torus, equal to \(T_8\), in every characteristic. (b) No root of \(E_6\) is orthogonal to all of \(\alpha_2^\vee,\dots,\alpha_5^\vee\) (computed), so \(Z_G(T_8)=T\). (c) Hence \(T_8\) is a maximal torus of \(H_k^\circ\) (its centralizer there lies in \(T\cap H=T_8\)). (d) \(H_k^\circ\) is reductive: identity component of the fixed points of an automorphism of order prime to \(\mathrm{char}\,k\) of a reductive group (Prasad–Yu 2002, Thm 2.1; CGP, Prop. A.8.12, as quoted in Conrad, Remark 3.1.5; Steinberg 1968; all characteristic-free, not opened). Its \(T_8\)-roots on \(\mathfrak g^\theta\) are the 24 roots of \(\Phi_L\) and the 24 restrictions \(\beta|_{T_8}\) of the pairs, each with a one-dimensional space: the root system \(F_4\). So \(H_k^\circ\simeq F_4\). (e) Let \(g\in H(k)\). \(\mathrm{Int}(g)\) preserves \(H_k^\circ\), and every automorphism of \(F_4\) is inner (Conrad, Thm 7.1.9: automorphisms modulo \(G_{\mathrm{ad}}\) are automorphisms of the based root datum, trivial for \(F_4\)); so \(\mathrm{Int}(g)|_{H^\circ}=\mathrm{Int}(h)\) with \(h\in H^\circ(k)\), and \(z=h^{-1}g\) centralizes \(T_8\). By (b) \(z\in T\cap H=T^\theta=T_8\subseteq H^\circ\). Thus \(H(k)=H^\circ(k)\), and \(H_k\), being smooth, is connected. (This replaces Steinberg's Thm 8.1, which is characteristic-free in any case.)
- \(X\) quasi-affine. Conrad, Thm 2.3.1, applied to the smooth affine \(G'\) and its multiplicative-type subgroup \(\mu_2\): \(G'/Z_{G'}(\mu_2)\) is a smooth quasi-affine \(\mathcal O\)-scheme (built from Artin's theorem, Knutson's representability for quasi-finite separated algebraic spaces and Zariski's Main Theorem). Since \(G'=G\cdot\mu_2\) and \(G\cap(H\times\mu_2)=H\), it is \(G/H\). Relative dimension \(78-52=26\). \(\tau\) is a monomorphism: \(g\theta(g)^{-1}=g'\theta(g')^{-1}\iff g^{-1}g'\in H\) on points with values in any \(\mathcal O\)-algebra.
- The open orbit. For \(g=ul\in B\cap H\) (\(u\in U_P\), \(l\in B_L\)): \(\theta(u)=u\,l\theta(l)^{-1}\in\theta(U_P)\cap P=U_P^-\cap P=1\) (\(\theta\) maps \(\Phi^+\smallsetminus\Phi_L\) into \(\Phi^-\), computed; \(U_P^-\times P\to G\) is an open immersion over \(\mathbb Z\)), so \(u=1\) and \(l\in B_L\cap L^\theta\). \(L=S\cdot\mathrm{Spin}_8\) with \(S\cap\mathrm{Spin}_8=S[2]\simeq\mu_2^2\) étale, \(\theta(sm)=s^{-1}m\), so \(L^\theta=S[2]\cdot\mathrm{Spin}_8=\mathrm{Spin}_8\) on geometric fibres (\(S[2]\subseteq T_8\), family page §4); \(L^\theta\) is smooth (step 2) and contains the smooth \(\mathrm{Spin}_8\) with the same fibres, so they are equal (EGA IV 17.9.5). Hence \(B\cap H=B_8\) (smooth, connected fibres, relative dimension 16) and \(P\cap H=\mathrm{Spin}_8\). The orbit map \(B/B_8\to X\) is a monomorphism of smooth \(\mathcal O\)-schemes of relative dimension \(42-16=26\); on each fibre it is unramified between smooth varieties of equal dimension, hence étale and an open immersion; by the fibrewise flatness criterion it is flat, hence an open immersion (EGA IV 17.9.1). \(B/B_8\simeq U_P\times B_L/B_8=U_P\times T/T_8=U_P\times A_X\) is affine, and the purity argument of S4-4 step 4 (EGA IV 21.12.7 in the regular 27-dimensional \(X\)) gives \(\mathring X=U_P\times A_X\). The stabilizer \(B_8\) is smooth, so the orbit map of the special fibre is separable.
- Forms. \(\Omega^{26}_{X/\mathcal O}=G\times^H\det(\mathfrak g/\mathfrak h)^\vee\) and \(H\) has no non-trivial characters (connected semisimple fibres), so the bundle is \(G\)-equivariantly trivial. On \(\mathring X=B/B_8\), \(B_8\) acts on \(\det(\mathfrak b/\mathfrak b_8)\) by \(2\rho-2\rho_L\) restricted to \(T_8\), which pairs to \(1\cdot2-1\cdot2=0\) with \(\alpha_j^\vee\), \(j=2,\dots,5\) (\(\langle\rho_L,\alpha_j^\vee\rangle=(-3,1,1,1,1,-3)\), computed). Weil's construction of measures from volume forms works over every non-archimedean local field.
- \(X(\mathcal O)=Kx_0\). \(G\to X\) is an \(H\)-torsor; \(H^1(\mathcal O_{\text{ét}},H)=1\) for smooth affine \(H\) with connected fibres over the henselian \(\mathcal O\) with finite residue field (Hensel reduces to \(H^1(\mathbb F_q,H_{\mathbb F_q})\), which vanishes by Lang): the argument recorded in Conrad after Remark 7.2.13 for any non-archimedean local field. So every \(x\in X(\mathcal O)\) lifts to \(G(\mathcal O)\).
Characteristic. Only \(2\in\mathcal O^\times\) is used (steps 2, 5, 6); no step uses \(\mathrm{char}\,F=0\).
Builds on
- Audit 3.1 · Where the \(p\)-adic verification (S4, S4b) used characteristic 0, and what replaces it
Built on by
- Lemma 3.3 · (A5)(A5) X homogeneous and affine, and the open Borel orbit has a single B(F)-orbit of F-points (§8). and Galois cohomology over \(\mathbb F_q((t))\): \(X(F)=G(F)x_0\), \(X_F\) affine
- Proposition 3.4 · Maximal \(\theta\)-split tori: dimension 2, one \(H(F)\)-class (residue char. \(\ne2\))
- Proposition 3.6 · Char \(\ne2\): 45 maximal-rank Borel orbits \(Bn_wx_0\), all pairs of type \(G\) or \(U\)
- Proposition 3.7 · Char \(\ne2\): two colours, the valuation cone, spherical roots \(\gamma_1,\gamma_6\)
- Audit 3.9 · Axiom 2.4.2Sakellaridis's Axiom 2.4.2, relabelled (A3c): Iwahori orbits at the antidominant torus points. for \(\mathcal M_\theta\) over \(\mathbb F_q((t))\): S4-5 re-checked
- Summary 3.12 · (Q3) verdict: (A1)(A1) Field and group: F a non-archimedean local field of characteristic 0 (Sakellaridis §1.1), G split reductive over O with connected fibres and simply connected derived group (§1.7).–(A3c)(A3c) Iwahori orbits (Sakellaridis's Axiom 2.4.2): xJ ⊆ xB(O) for every X-antidominant torus point x., (A5)(A5) X homogeneous and affine, and the open Borel orbit has a single B(F)-orbit of F-points (§8)., (A4)(A4) Spherical roots and colours: no pair of maximal rank of type N; classical Levis L_γ; Statements 6.3.1 and 7.1.5.(i,ii,iv) hold over \(\mathbb F_q((t))\)
- Audit 5.8 · Audit of A3-1, A3-2, A3-3: integral model, \(H^1\) and (A5)(A5) X homogeneous and affine, and the open Borel orbit has a single B(F)-orbit of F-points (§8). over \(\mathbb F_q((t))\)
Sources
- conrad-reductive-group-schemes.pdf, Lemma 2.2.4 (p. 64–66), Thm 2.3.1 (pp. 67–69), Remark 3.1.5, Thm 7.1.9, discussion after Remark 7.2.13 (p. 259)
- EGA IV 17.9.1, 17.9.5, 21.12.7 (not in local sources)
- Prasad–Yu, Invent. Math. 147 (2002), Thm 2.1; CGP Prop. A.8.12 (cited, not opened)
- families/e6-f4.html §4 (S[2] ⊆ T_8)
- S4-4, S4-11