8 · Source · Sakellaridis–Venkatesh

Norm balls

Step (1) of the Proposition is modelled on a lemma of Sakellaridis–Venkatesh about norm balls. This page restates their definitions and lemma in the notation of the other pages (left action, \(F=\mathbb C(\!(t)\!)\), \(\mathfrak o\), \(K\), dominant \(\lambda\)) and works each one out in \(X=\mathrm{SL}_2/\mathrm{SO}_2\). Their original wording is in step 8.

Executive summary
Source. Y. Sakellaridis, A. Venkatesh, Periods and harmonic analysis on spherical varieties, Astérisque 396 (2017), §5.5, printed pp. 85–86 (arXiv:1203.0039). Extracted pages: sources/SV17-section-5.5-pp85-86.pdf.

1 Valuations of functions on \(LX\)

Definition For a Laurent series \(f=\sum_{n\ge n_0}c_nt^n\in F\) with \(c_{n_0}\neq0\), \(\operatorname{val}f=n_0\), and \(\operatorname{val}0=+\infty\). So for a polynomial or Laurent polynomial in \(t\), \(\operatorname{val}f\) is its lowest exponent. It satisfies \[ \operatorname{val}(fg)=\operatorname{val}f+\operatorname{val}g,\qquad \operatorname{val}(f+g)\ge\min(\operatorname{val}f,\operatorname{val}g). \] A regular function \(\varphi\in k[X]\) is a polynomial in the coordinates of \(X\). At a loop \(x\in LX=X(F)\) its value \(\varphi(x)\) lies in \(F\), so \(\operatorname{val}\varphi(x)\) is defined. For a matrix, \(\operatorname{val}A:=\min_{i,j}\operatorname{val}A_{ij}\), and the pole order of \(A\) is \(-\operatorname{val}A\).
Examples
\(\operatorname{val}(3t^2+t^5)=2\), \(\operatorname{val}(t^{-1}+7)=-1\), \(\operatorname{val}(1+t)=0\). Let \(z(A)=A_{22}\), a polynomial function on \(X\), and \(A=\begin{pmatrix}1&t^{-1}\\t^{-1}&1+t^{-2}\end{pmatrix}\in LX\). Then \(z(A)=1+t^{-2}\) and \(\operatorname{val}z(A)=-2\). For \(A_{11}\) instead, \(\operatorname{val}A_{11}(A)=0\). The matrix has \(\operatorname{val}A=-2\), so pole order 2.

SV work over a \(p\)-adic field with \(|f|=q^{-\operatorname{val}f}\), \(q\) the size of the residue field. Over \(\mathbb C(\!(t)\!)\) use the same formula with any fixed \(q>1\); below we work with \(\operatorname{val}\) directly.

2 Functions on \(X\): why \(k[X]=\bigoplus_{n\ge0}V_{2n}\)

\(G\) acts on functions by \((g\varphi)(x)=\varphi(g^{-1}\cdot x)\). Let \(T\subset B\subset\mathrm{SL}_2\) be the diagonal and upper triangular subgroups, and \(\varpi:T\to\mathbb G_m\), \(\varpi(\operatorname{diag}(s,s^{-1}))=s\).

Definition \(V_n:=\mathrm{Sym}^n(\mathbb C^2)\), with basis \(e_1^{\,n-j}e_2^{\,j}\) (\(0\le j\le n\)) and \(g\) acting by \(e_i\mapsto ge_i\). Since \(\operatorname{diag}(s,s^{-1})\cdot e_1^{\,n-j}e_2^{\,j}=s^{\,n-2j}\,e_1^{\,n-j}e_2^{\,j}\), \[ \dim V_n=n+1,\qquad \text{weights of }V_n=\{n,\ n-2,\ \dots,\ -n\}\ (\text{times }\varpi),\ \text{each once}. \] \(V_n\) is irreducible, every irreducible algebraic representation of \(\mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbb C)\) is one \(V_n\), and \(V_n^*\cong V_n\) [FH, Lecture 11]. Its highest weight is \(n\varpi\), carried by \(e_1^{\,n}\), the unique line fixed by \(B\).
Proved (cited) \(k[X]\cong\bigoplus_{n\ge0}V_{2n}\) as a representation of \(\mathrm{SL}_2\), each \(V_{2n}\) occurring exactly once.
  1. Functions on \(G/H\) are \(H\)-invariant functions on \(G\): \(k[G/H]=k[G]^H\), for \(H\) acting by right translation.
  2. Algebraic Peter–Weyl [GW, Thm 4.2.7]: as a \(G\times G\)-representation (left and right translation), \[k[G]\cong\textstyle\bigoplus_{n\ge0}V_n^*\otimes V_n .\]
  3. Take \(H\)-invariants on the right: \(k[G/H]\cong\bigoplus_nV_n^*\otimes V_n^H\), so \(V_n^*\cong V_n\) occurs \(\dim V_n^H\) times.
  4. \(H=\mathrm{SO}_2\) is a torus: \(\begin{pmatrix}a&-b\\b&a\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}1\\\pm i\end{pmatrix}=(a\mp bi)\begin{pmatrix}1\\\pm i\end{pmatrix}\), so \(\mathrm{SO}_2=gTg^{-1}\) with \(g\) the matrix of columns \((1,i),(1,-i)\) (rescaled to \(\det=1\)). Hence \(V_n^{\mathrm{SO}_2}=g\cdot V_n^T\), and \(V_n^T\) is the weight-0 space.
  5. Count: \(0\in\{n,n-2,\dots,-n\}\) iff \(n\) is even, and then once. So \(\dim V_n^{\mathrm{SO}_2}=1\) for even \(n\) and \(0\) for odd \(n\). \(\square\)
Figure 1. Rows: \(V_0,\dots,V_5\); horizontal axis: weight (multiple of \(\varpi\)); dots: the weights of \(V_n\), orange = weight 0 = an \(\mathrm{SO}_2\)-fixed line. Only even \(n\) have one, so \(k[X]=V_0\oplus V_2\oplus V_4\oplus\cdots\).
Proved here Check by counting. Write \(A=\begin{pmatrix}x&y\\y&z\end{pmatrix}\), so \(k[X]=\mathbb C[x,y,z]/(xz-y^2-1)\). The functions of degree \(\le d\) form a space of dimension \[ \tbinom{d+3}{3}-\tbinom{d+1}{3}=(d+1)^2=1+3+5+\dots+(2d+1)=\dim\big(V_0\oplus V_2\oplus\dots\oplus V_{2d}\big). \] For \(d=1\): the constants (\(V_0\)) and \(x,y,z\) (\(V_2\), the action \(A\mapsto gAg^t\) on symmetric matrices). For \(d=2\): 10 quadratic-or-lower monomials minus the relation, giving \(1+3+5\).

Highest weight vectors. Let \(B\) be upper triangular. For \(b=\begin{pmatrix}s&u\\0&s^{-1}\end{pmatrix}\), \((b\,z)(A)=(b^{-1}Ab^{-t})_{22}=s^2A_{22}\). So \(z^n\) is a \(B\)-eigenfunction of weight \(2n\varpi\), the highest weight of \(V_{2n}\).

Proved (cited) Each \(V_{2n}\) occurring once is what makes \(X\) spherical: for quasi-affine \(X=G/H\), \(B\) has an open orbit exactly when \(k[X]\) is multiplicity-free [VK; GW, Thm 12.2.1, Prop. 12.2.4; Br, Lemma 2.12]. The highest weights \(2n\varpi\) are the data the norm is built from.

Is the computation correct?

Yes. Three independent checks agree on \(k[X]=\bigoplus_{n\ge0}V_{2n}\):

Table 1. check and what it gives
checkwhat it gives
Peter–Weyl + \(\mathrm{SO}_2\) a torus (steps 1–5)multiplicity of \(V_n\) \(=\dim V_n^{\mathrm{SO}_2}=1\) or \(0\)
Cartan–Helgason for the symmetric pair \((\mathrm{SL}_2,\mathrm{SO}_2)\) [GW, Thm 12.3.13, Cor. 12.3.15]\(V_n^{\mathrm{SO}_2}\ne0\iff n\varpi\in2\mathbb Z\varpi\)
Counting degrees in \(\mathbb C[x,y,z]/(xz-y^2-1)\)\((d+1)^2=\sum_{n\le d}\dim V_{2n}\)

The counting row is a dimension check, not a proof: it is consistent with, but does not by itself identify, the representation on functions of degree \(\le d\). Two points one might worry about are fine: \(k[G/H]=k[G]^H\) holds for every closed \(H\), and \(V_n^H\) only depends on \(H\) up to conjugacy.

Example 2.2: the same recipe for other subgroups \(H\)
Steps 1–3 hold for any closed \(H\subset\mathrm{SL}_2\): \(V_n\) occurs in \(k[\mathrm{SL}_2/H]\) exactly \(\dim V_n^H\) times. Only step 4 changes.
  • \(H=U=\left\{\left(\begin{smallmatrix}1&u\\0&1\end{smallmatrix}\right)\right\}\). \(\mathrm{SL}_2/U\cong\mathbb C^2\smallsetminus\{0\}\) via \(gU\mapsto ge_1\). \(V_n^U=\mathbb C\,e_1^{\,n}\) (the highest weight line), so every \(V_n\) occurs once. Direct check: functions on \(\mathbb C^2\smallsetminus\{0\}\) extend to \(\mathbb C^2\) (Hartogs), so \(k[\mathbb C^2\smallsetminus0]=\mathbb C[v_1,v_2]\), and its degree-\(n\) part is \(\mathrm{Sym}^n((\mathbb C^2)^*)\cong V_n\).
  • \(H=N(T)=T\sqcup wT\), \(w=\left(\begin{smallmatrix}0&-1\\1&0\end{smallmatrix}\right)\). \(V_n^T=\mathbb C\,e_1^{\,n/2}e_2^{\,n/2}\) for \(n\) even, and \(w\) sends \(e_1\mapsto e_2\), \(e_2\mapsto-e_1\), so it multiplies this vector by \((-1)^{n/2}\). Fixed iff \(4\mid n\).
  • \(H=\mathrm{SL}_2\): \(V_n^H=0\) unless \(n=0\); a point has only constants.
Table 2. \(H\) and \(X=\mathrm{SL}_2/H\) and \(\dim V_n^H\)
\(H\)\(X=\mathrm{SL}_2/H\)\(\dim V_n^H\)\(k[X]\)
\(U\)\(\mathbb C^2\smallsetminus\{0\}\)\(1\) for all \(n\)\(V_0\oplus V_1\oplus V_2\oplus\cdots\)
\(\mathrm{SO}_2\)\(\{A=A^t,\det A=1\}\)\(1\) iff \(2\mid n\)\(V_0\oplus V_2\oplus V_4\oplus\cdots\)
\(N(T)\)\(\mathrm{SL}_2/N(T)\)\(1\) iff \(4\mid n\)\(V_0\oplus V_4\oplus V_8\oplus\cdots\)
\(\mathrm{SL}_2\)a point\(1\) iff \(n=0\)\(V_0\)
The first three rows reappear in step 3 as three different lattices \(\mathcal X(X)\subset X^*(T)\).
Literature for this step.
  • [FH] W. Fulton, J. Harris, Representation Theory: A First Course, GTM 129, Springer, 1991, doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0979-9. Lecture 11, pp. 146–160: the irreducible representations of \(\mathfrak{sl}_2\mathbb C\) are \(\mathrm{Sym}^n\mathbb C^2\).
  • [GW] R. Goodman, N. R. Wallach, Symmetry, Representations, and Invariants, GTM 255, Springer, 2009, doi:10.1007/978-0-387-79852-3. Thm 4.2.7 (algebraic Peter–Weyl, step 2); Thm 12.2.1, Prop. 12.2.4 (open \(B\)-orbit \(\Leftrightarrow\) multiplicity-free); Thm 12.3.13 (Cartan–Helgason) and Cor. 12.3.15 with its list for type AI (spherical weights \(2\varpi_i\); for \(\mathrm{SL}_2/\mathrm{SO}_2\): \(k[X]=\bigoplus V_{2n}\)).
  • [Br] M. Brion, Introduction to actions of algebraic groups, Les cours du CIRM 1 (2010), 1–22, doi:10.5802/ccirm.1 (open access). §2.1: weight monoid and weight group; Prop. 2.8(i): a \(B\)-eigenfunction in \(k(X)\) is a ratio of ones in \(k[X]\) (\(X\) affine), so \(\mathcal X(X)\) is generated by \(\mathcal X(X)^+\); Example 2.11(4): \(\mathrm{SL}_n/\mathrm{SO}_n\) has weight monoid generated by \(2\varpi_1,\dots,2\varpi_{n-1}\) (here \(n=2\)); Lemma 2.12.
  • [VK] É. B. Vinberg, B. N. Kimel'fel'd, Homogeneous domains on flag manifolds and spherical subgroups of semisimple Lie groups, Funct. Anal. Appl. 12 (1978), no. 3, 168–174, doi:10.1007/BF01681428.
  • [Ti] D. A. Timashev, Homogeneous Spaces and Equivariant Embeddings, Encycl. Math. Sci. 138, Springer, 2011, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-18399-7. In the draft arXiv:math/0602228: Def. 5.1 (\(\Lambda(X)\), \(\Lambda^+(X)\)) and Prop. 5.5 (\(\Lambda(X)=\mathbb Z\Lambda^+(X)\) for quasi-affine \(X\)); book numbering not checked.
  • For SV's own definitions of \(\mathcal X(X)\), \(\Lambda_X\), \(\mathfrak a_X\), \(A_X\): [SV, §2.1].

Checked 2026-10-06 against Crossref and the texts; [FH] was checked only through its table of contents.

3 Weights, and where \(\mathfrak a_X\) comes from

3a. The pairing \(\langle\lambda,\chi\rangle\)

Definition For the maximal torus \(T\subset B\subset G\), homomorphisms of algebraic groups give two lattices: \[ X^*(T):=\operatorname{Hom}_{\mathrm{AlgGrp}}(T,\mathbb G_m)\ni\chi,\qquad \Lambda_T:=X_*(T)=\operatorname{Hom}_{\mathrm{AlgGrp}}(\mathbb G_m,T)\ni\lambda . \] The composite \(\chi\circ\lambda:\mathbb G_m\to\mathbb G_m\) is \(s\mapsto s^n\) for a unique \(n\in\mathbb Z\), because \(\operatorname{Hom}_{\mathrm{AlgGrp}}(\mathbb G_m,\mathbb G_m)=\mathbb Z\). That integer is the pairing: \[ \chi(\lambda(s))=s^{\langle\lambda,\chi\rangle},\qquad \langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle:\Lambda_T\times X^*(T)\to\mathbb Z . \] It is bilinear and perfect. The loop attached to \(\lambda\) is \(t^\lambda:=\lambda(t)\in T(F)\).
Proved here Why this pairing appears. Put \(s=t\): \[ \chi(t^\lambda)=t^{\langle\lambda,\chi\rangle},\qquad \operatorname{val}\chi(t^\lambda)=\langle\lambda,\chi\rangle . \] For a \(B\)-eigenfunction \(f\) of weight \(\chi\) (3b: \(f(b^{-1}\cdot x)=\chi(b)f(x)\)), take \(b=t^{-\lambda}\): \[ f(t^\lambda\cdot x)=t^{-\langle\lambda,\chi\rangle}f(x),\qquad \operatorname{val}f(t^\lambda\cdot x)=\operatorname{val}f(x)-\langle\lambda,\chi\rangle . \] So \(\langle\lambda,\chi\rangle\) is exactly the number of poles that \(t^\lambda\) adds to an eigenfunction of weight \(\chi\). This is why it appears in the norm and in the lemma.
Example 3.1: \(G=\mathrm{SL}_2\)
\(X^*(T)=\mathbb Z\varpi\), and \(\Lambda_T=\{\lambda_m:m\in\mathbb Z\}\) with \(\lambda_m(s)=\operatorname{diag}(s^m,s^{-m})\), written \((m,-m)\). Then \[ (k\varpi)\big(\lambda_m(s)\big)=s^{mk},\qquad \langle(m,-m),k\varpi\rangle=mk . \] Check with \(f=z=A_{22}\), weight \(2\varpi\) (step 2): the \((2,2)\)-entry of \(t^\lambda\cdot A=t^\lambda At^\lambda\) is \(t^{-2m}z\), and \(\langle(m,-m),2\varpi\rangle=2m\).

3b. The weight lattice \(\mathcal X(X)\) and \(\mathfrak a_X\)

Definition A \(B\)-eigenfunction of weight \(\chi\) is a nonzero rational function \(f\in k(X)\) with \(f(b^{-1}\cdot x)=\chi(b)f(x)\) for all \(b\in B\), where \(\chi:B\to\mathbb G_m\) is a character. Let
  • \(\mathcal X(X)\): the weights of eigenfunctions in \(k(X)\) (rational functions); a group, since products of eigenfunctions are eigenfunctions;
  • \(\mathcal X(X)^+\): the weights of eigenfunctions in \(k[X]\) (regular functions); a monoid;
  • \(\mathfrak a_X:=\operatorname{Hom}_{\mathrm{Grp}}(\mathcal X(X),\mathbb Q)=\mathcal X(X)^\vee\otimes\mathbb Q\), the group homomorphisms; for \(\mu\in\mathfrak a_X\) write \(\langle\mu,\chi\rangle:=\mu(\chi)\).
For each \(\chi\in\mathcal X(X)\) fix one eigenfunction \(f_\chi\), with \(f_{\chi+\chi'}=f_\chi f_{\chi'}\). For spherical \(X\) this is a choice of scalars only: two eigenfunctions of the same weight have a \(B\)-invariant ratio, which is constant on the open \(B\)-orbit.

3c. How \(\mathcal X(X)\) sits inside \(X^*(T)\)

A character of \(B=T\ltimes U\) is trivial on the unipotent group \(U\), so \(X^*(B)=X^*(T)\) and always \(\mathcal X(X)\subset X^*(T)\). Which characters occur is decided by one stabilizer.

Proved here Let \(X\) be spherical, \(x_0\) a point of the open \(B\)-orbit, \(B_{x_0}\subset B\) its stabilizer, and \(T_{x_0}\subset T\) the image of \(B_{x_0}\) under \(B\to B/U=T\). Then \[ \mathcal X(X)=\{\chi\in X^*(T):\ \chi|_{T_{x_0}}=1\}=X^*(T/T_{x_0}). \] Hence \[ \begin{aligned} \mathcal X(X)=X^*(T)&\iff T_{x_0}=1,\\ [X^*(T):\mathcal X(X)]<\infty&\iff T_{x_0}\text{ is finite},\\ \operatorname{rk}\mathcal X(X)&=\dim T-\dim T_{x_0}. \end{aligned} \]
Proof
  1. The zeros and poles of an eigenfunction \(f\) form a \(B\)-stable proper closed subset, so they miss the open orbit \(Bx_0\): \(f(x_0)\in k^\times\).
  2. (\(\subset\)) For \(b\in B_{x_0}\): \(f(x_0)=f(b^{-1}x_0)=\chi(b)f(x_0)\), so \(\chi(b)=1\).
  3. (\(\supset\)) If \(\chi|_{B_{x_0}}=1\), then \(f(bx_0):=\chi(b)^{-1}\) is well defined on \(Bx_0\cong B/B_{x_0}\), hence a rational function on \(X\), and \(f(b^{-1}b'x_0)=\chi(b)\chi(b')^{-1}=\chi(b)f(b'x_0)\).
  4. \(\chi\) factors through \(T\), so \(\chi|_{B_{x_0}}=1\iff\chi|_{T_{x_0}}=1\). Characters of a diagonalizable group separate points, which gives the three consequences. \(\square\)
The torus \(A_X:=T/T_{x_0}\) has \(X^*(A_X)=\mathcal X(X)\); this is the draft's \(A_X\).
Three examples: equal, finite index, smaller rank

Example 3.2 (equal). \(X=\mathrm{SL}_2/U=\mathbb C^2\smallsetminus\{0\}\) (Example 2.2). The open \(B\)-orbit is \(\{v_2\ne0\}\); take \(x_0=e_2\). For \(b=\left(\begin{smallmatrix}s&u\\0&s^{-1}\end{smallmatrix}\right)\), \(be_2=(u,s^{-1})^t=e_2\) forces \(b=1\). So \(T_{x_0}=1\) and \[ \mathcal X(X)=X^*(T)=\mathbb Z\varpi,\qquad f_\varpi=v_2,\quad v_2(b^{-1}v)=s\,v_2(v). \]

Example 3.3 (index 2; the running example). \(X=\mathrm{SL}_2/\mathrm{SO}_2\), \(B\) acting by \(A\mapsto bAb^t\). The open \(B\)-orbit is \(\{z\ne0\}\); take \(x_0=I\). Then \(B_I=\{b\in B:bb^t=I\}\): upper triangular and orthogonal means diagonal with entries \(\pm1\), so \(T_{x_0}=\{\pm I\}\). Since \((k\varpi)(-I)=(-1)^k\), \[ \mathcal X(X)=2\mathbb Z\varpi\subsetneq\mathbb Z\varpi=X^*(T),\qquad A_X=T/\{\pm I\}. \] This \(\{\pm I\}\) is the source of every factor 2 on these pages.

Example 3.4 (smaller rank). \(X=\mathrm{SL}_2\) under \(G=\mathrm{SL}_2\times\mathrm{SL}_2\), \((g_1,g_2)\cdot x=g_1xg_2^{-1}\), with \(T\times T\subset B\times B\). The open orbit is the big cell \(BwB\); take \(x_0=w=\left(\begin{smallmatrix}0&-1\\1&0\end{smallmatrix}\right)\). Then \(b_1wb_2^{-1}=w\) forces \(b_2=w^{-1}b_1w\in B\cap w^{-1}Bw=T\), so \(T_{x_0}=\{(t,t^{-1}):t\in T\}\), a one-dimensional torus. A character \((a\varpi,b\varpi)\) kills it iff \(a=b\): \[ \mathcal X(X)=\mathbb Z(\varpi,\varpi)\subsetneq\mathbb Z\varpi\oplus\mathbb Z\varpi=X^*(T\times T),\qquad f_{(\varpi,\varpi)}=x_{21}. \] Rank 1 inside rank 2. (Contrast page: group \(\mathrm{SL}_2\).)

Table 3. \(X\) and \(T_{x_0}\) and \(\mathcal X(X)\subset X^*(T)\)
\(X\)\(T_{x_0}\)\(\mathcal X(X)\subset X^*(T)\)
\(\mathbb C^2\smallsetminus\{0\}\)\(1\)\(\mathbb Z\varpi=\mathbb Z\varpi\)
\(\mathrm{SL}_2/\mathrm{SO}_2\)\(\{\pm I\}\)\(2\mathbb Z\varpi\subset\mathbb Z\varpi\), index 2
\(\mathrm{SL}_2\) under \(\mathrm{SL}_2^2\)\(\{(t,t^{-1})\}\)\(\mathbb Z(\varpi,\varpi)\subset\mathbb Z^2\), rank 1

3d. The map \(\Lambda_T\to\mathfrak a_X\)

Definition Restricting the functional \(\langle\lambda,\cdot\rangle\) from \(X^*(T)\) to the sublattice \(\mathcal X(X)\) gives \[ \Lambda_T\to\mathfrak a_X,\qquad \lambda\mapsto\overline\lambda,\qquad \overline\lambda(\chi)=\langle\lambda,\chi\rangle\quad(\chi\in\mathcal X(X)). \]
Example 3.5: the running example
By step 2 the eigenfunctions in \(k[X]\) are the highest weight vectors, the multiples of \(z^n\), and every eigenfunction in \(k(X)\) is a ratio of these [Br, Prop. 2.8(i)]. So with \(\chi:=2\varpi\), \[ \mathcal X(X)^+=\mathbb N\chi,\quad f_{n\chi}=z^n;\qquad \mathcal X(X)=\mathbb Z\chi;\qquad \mathfrak a_X=\operatorname{Hom}_{\mathrm{Grp}}(\mathbb Z\chi,\mathbb Q)\xrightarrow{\ \sim\ }\mathbb Q,\ \ \mu\mapsto\langle\mu,\chi\rangle . \] So \(\mathfrak a_X\) is a line (\(X\) has rank one). For \(\lambda=(m,-m)\), \(\overline\lambda=\langle(m,-m),2\varpi\rangle=2m\):
Table 4. \(\lambda\) and \(\overline\lambda\in\mathfrak a_X=\mathbb Q\) and \(r(\lambda)=\lambda-\theta\lambda\)
\(\lambda\)\(\overline\lambda\in\mathfrak a_X=\mathbb Q\)\(r(\lambda)=\lambda-\theta\lambda\)
\((0,0)\)0\((0,0)\)
\((1,-1)\)2\((2,-2)\)
\((m,-m)\)\(2m\)\((2m,-2m)\)
The factor 2 in \(\overline\lambda\) is the index \([X^*(T):\mathcal X(X)]=2\) of Example 3.3. Equivalently \(\Lambda_T\to\Lambda_X:=X_*(A_X)\cong\mathbb Z\) is \(\lambda\mapsto2m\).

3e. Positivity: \(\mathcal X(X)^+\) and the order \(\succeq\)

Definition A weight \(\chi\in\mathcal X(X)\) is positive, \(\chi\in\mathcal X(X)^+\), when its eigenfunction \(f_\chi\) is regular on all of \(X\), not merely rational. The positive weights order \(\mathfrak a_X\): \[ \mu\succeq\mu'\iff\langle\mu,\chi\rangle\ge\langle\mu',\chi\rangle\ \text{ for all }\chi\in\mathcal X(X)^+ . \] It suffices to test \(\chi\) in a set of generators of the monoid \(\mathcal X(X)^+\).
Example 3.6: rank one, a total order
In \(\mathrm{SL}_2/\mathrm{SO}_2\), \(z^n\) is regular for \(n\ge0\), but \(z^{-1}\) is not, since \(z\) vanishes at the point \(\left(\begin{smallmatrix}0&i\\i&0\end{smallmatrix}\right)\in X\). So \[ \mathcal X(X)^+=\mathbb N\chi\subsetneq\mathbb Z\chi=\mathcal X(X),\qquad \mu\succeq\mu'\iff\langle\mu,\chi\rangle\ge\langle\mu',\chi\rangle , \] the usual \(\ge\) on \(\mathbb Q\). Every two elements are comparable.
Example 3.7: rank two, a genuinely partial order
\(G=\mathrm{SL}_3\), \(X=\mathrm{SL}_3/U\), \(T\) diagonal, \(B\) upper triangular. Let \(\varpi_1,\varpi_2\in X^*(T)\) send \(\operatorname{diag}(s_1,s_2,s_3)\) to \(s_1\), \(s_1s_2\). As in Example 3.2, \(T_{x_0}=1\), and the regular eigenfunctions are generated by \[ f_{\varpi_2}(gU)=g_{31},\qquad f_{\varpi_1}(gU)=\det\begin{pmatrix}g_{21}&g_{22}\\g_{31}&g_{32}\end{pmatrix},\qquad \mathcal X(X)^+=\mathbb N\varpi_1\oplus\mathbb N\varpi_2 . \] Here \(\mathfrak a_X=\Lambda_T\otimes\mathbb Q=\{(a_1,a_2,a_3)\in\mathbb Q^3:\sum a_i=0\}\), and \(\langle\mu,\varpi_1\rangle=a_1\), \(\langle\mu,\varpi_2\rangle=a_1+a_2\). So \[ \mu\succeq0\iff a_1\ge0\ \text{and}\ a_1+a_2\ge0\iff\mu\in\mathbb Q_{\ge0}\alpha_1^\vee+\mathbb Q_{\ge0}\alpha_2^\vee, \] with \(\alpha_1^\vee=(1,-1,0)\), \(\alpha_2^\vee=(0,1,-1)\): on \(G/U\), \(\succeq\) is the dominance order used in step 7.
Figure 2. \(\mathfrak a_X\) for \(\mathrm{SL}_3/U\) in the coordinates \((\langle\mu,\varpi_1\rangle,\langle\mu,\varpi_2\rangle)\). Shaded quadrants: \(\mu\succeq0\) (blue) and \(\mu\preceq0\) (orange); dots in the white quadrants are incomparable with \(0\).
Table 5. \(\mu\) and \((\langle\mu,\varpi_1\rangle,\langle\mu,\varpi_2\rangle)\) and compared with \(0\)
\(\mu\)\((\langle\mu,\varpi_1\rangle,\langle\mu,\varpi_2\rangle)\)compared with \(0\)
\(\alpha_1^\vee=(1,-1,0)\)\((1,0)\)\(\succeq0\)
\(\alpha_1^\vee+\alpha_2^\vee=(1,0,-1)\)\((1,1)\)\(\succeq0\)
\((1,-2,1)\)\((1,-1)\)incomparable
\((-1,0,1)\)\((-1,-1)\)\(\preceq0\)

4 The norm

Big picture
  • Goal. Give every loop \(x\in LX\) a size that depends only on its \(K\)-orbit, and that \(t^\lambda\) changes by a computable amount.
  • Raw material. A regular function \(f\) on \(X\) evaluated at a loop is a Laurent series \(f(x)\in F\); its pole order \(-\operatorname{val}f(x)\) measures how far \(x\) is from the arcs \(L^+X\), where all such values lie in \(\mathfrak o\).
  • Which \(f\). An eigenfunction \(f_\chi\): by 3a, \(t^\lambda\) adds exactly \(\langle\lambda,\chi\rangle\) to its pole order.
  • Repair. \(f_\chi\) is \(B\)-equivariant but not \(K\)-invariant, so it can miss a pole (Example 4.3). Taking the worst value over \(K\) repairs this.
  • Outcome. One integer \(N_\chi(x)\) per positive weight \(\chi\). For \(\mathbb C^2\smallsetminus\{0\}\) it is the pole order of a vector; for \(\mathrm{SL}_2/\mathrm{SO}_2\) the pole order of a matrix, which labels the orbits \(\mathcal O_a\).
Table 6. ingredient and what it is and in \(\mathrm{SL}_2/\mathrm{SO}_2\)
ingredientwhat it isin \(\mathrm{SL}_2/\mathrm{SO}_2\)
\(K\)the arc group \(L^+G=G(\mathfrak o)\) (Before I.2): loops in \(G\) without poles. Its orbits \(\mathcal O_\nu\subset LX\) are what the Proposition is about, so a size must be \(K\)-invariant. It plays the role of SV's maximal compact subgroup, e.g. \(\mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbb Z_p)\).\(\mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbb C[\![t]\!])\)
\(\kappa\)an element of \(K\)
\(\chi\), \(f_\chi\)a positive weight and its chosen eigenfunction (3b), so \(f_\chi:X\to\mathbb A^1\) and \(f_\chi:LX\to F\)\(\chi=2\varpi\), \(f_\chi=z=A_{22}\)
Definition [SV, §5.5, in our conventions] For \(\chi\in\mathcal X(X)^+\) and \(x\in LX\), \[ N_\chi(x):=-\min_{{\kappa}\in K}\operatorname{val}f_\chi({\kappa}^{-1}\cdot x)\ \in\mathbb Z . \] Read it right to left: move \(x\) by \(\kappa^{-1}\), evaluate \(f_\chi\), take its order of vanishing, minimize over \(\kappa\) (the worst pole), negate. SV write it multiplicatively, \(\|x\|_\chi=q^{N_\chi(x)}=\max_{{\kappa}\in K}|f_\chi({\kappa}^{-1}\cdot x)|\). The minimum over \(K\) makes \(N_\chi\) \(K\)-invariant, and \(N_{n\chi}=nN_\chi\).
Example 4.1: why it is called a norm
\(X=\mathbb C^2\smallsetminus\{0\}\), \(\chi=\varpi\), \(f_\varpi=v_2\) (Example 3.2). For \(v\in LX=F^2\smallsetminus\{0\}\), \[ N_\varpi(v)=-\min(\operatorname{val}v_1,\operatorname{val}v_2),\qquad \|v\|_\varpi=\max(|v_1|,|v_2|), \] the standard sup-norm on \(F^2\), which \(K=\mathrm{SL}_2(\mathfrak o)\) preserves.

Proof. \((\kappa^{-1}v)_2=w\cdot v\), where \(w\) is the second row of \(\kappa^{-1}\), a vector in \(\mathfrak o^2\); so \(\operatorname{val}(w\cdot v)\ge\min_i\operatorname{val}v_i\). The rows \(w=e_2\) (\(\kappa=I\)) and \(w=e_1\) (\(\kappa^{-1}=\left(\begin{smallmatrix}0&-1\\1&0\end{smallmatrix}\right)\)) give \(v_2\) and \(v_1\), so equality is attained. \(\square\)

Proved here Example 4.2. In \(X=\mathrm{SL}_2/\mathrm{SO}_2\), \(N_\chi(A)=\) the pole order of \(A\), i.e. \(-\min_{i,j}\operatorname{val}A_{ij}\).

Proof. \(({\kappa}^{-1}A{\kappa}^{-t})_{22}=w^tAw\), where \(w\) is the second row of \({\kappa}^{-1}\), a vector in \(\mathfrak o^2\); so \(\operatorname{val}(w^tAw)\ge\operatorname{val}A\). Conversely \(w=e_1,e_2,e_1+e_2\) are second rows of elements of \(K\) and give \(x\), \(z\), \(x+2y+z\). If neither \(x\) nor \(z\) attains \(\operatorname{val}A\), then \(y\) does, strictly, and \(\operatorname{val}(x+2y+z)=\operatorname{val}y\). \(\square\)

Example 4.3: why the minimum over \(K\)
Table 7. \(A\) and \(\operatorname{val}z(A)\) and \(N_\chi(A)\)
\(A\)\(\operatorname{val}z(A)\)\(N_\chi(A)\)
\(I\)00
\(\operatorname{diag}(t,t^{-1})\)\(-1\)1
\(\operatorname{diag}(t^{-1},t)\)\(1\)1
The last two lie in the same orbit \(\mathcal O_1\). The single function \(z\) cannot see the pole of \(\operatorname{diag}(t^{-1},t)\); after moving by \({\kappa}=w\) it can.

5 How far one loop moves the norm

Proved (cited) [SV, Lemma 5.5.1, in our conventions] For \(\chi,\chi'\in\mathcal X(X)^+\), \(\lambda\in\Lambda_T^+\) and \(x\in LX\): \[ \text{(1)}\ \ N_{\chi+\chi'}(x)\le N_\chi(x)+N_{\chi'}(x);\qquad \text{(2)}\ \ N_\chi(t^\lambda\cdot x)\le N_\chi(x)+\langle\lambda,\chi\rangle . \]
Instance
With \(t^\lambda=\operatorname{diag}(t^m,t^{-m})\), \[ t^\lambda\cdot A=\begin{pmatrix}t^{2m}x&y\\ y&t^{-2m}z\end{pmatrix},\qquad N_\chi(t^\lambda\cdot A)\le N_\chi(A)+2m=N_\chi(A)+\langle\lambda,\chi\rangle, \] with equality when \(z\) carries the worst pole, and strict inequality when \(x\) does.
\(A\):
\(m\):
Figure 3. Vertical axis: valuation of each entry \(x,y,z\) of \(A\) (lower = worse pole). Hollow dot: \(A\); filled dot: \(t^\lambda\cdot A\). The dashed lines mark the worst pole, \(-N_\chi\), before (grey) and after (blue); it moves the full \(2m\) exactly when \(z\) carries a worst pole.

6 Norm balls

Definition [SV, §5.5] For \(\mu\in\mathfrak a_X\), \[ X_{\succeq\mu}:=\{x\in LX:\ N_\chi(x)\le-\langle\mu,\chi\rangle\ \text{ for all }\chi\in\mathcal X(X)^+\}. \] These sets are \(K\)-invariant, and a larger \(\mu\) gives a smaller ball.
Instance
Only \(\chi\) matters, since \(N_{n\chi}=nN_\chi\). With \(s=\langle\mu,\chi\rangle\in\mathbb Q\): \[ X_{\succeq s}=\{A:\ \text{pole order of }A\le-s\},\qquad X_{\succeq-a}=\overline{\mathcal O}_a, \] by step 4 and the orbit closures. The ball is nonempty only for \(s\le0\). In the tree it is the set of lines meeting the ball of radius \(a\) about \(v_0\) (Part III of the example). The ball index \(\mu\) runs opposite to the orbit index: \(\mu=-a\leftrightarrow\nu=(a,-a)\).
Ball radius:
Figure 4. The tree (finite part); each thick line is the line \(\ell_A\) of one loop \(A\), at distance 0, 1, 1, 2, 3 or 4 from \(v_0\). Filled / hollow dots: vertices at even / odd distance from \(v_0\). Shaded disc: radius \(a\) about \(v_0\); blue solid: \(A\in X_{\succeq-a}\); grey dashed: outside. Raising \(a\) lets more lines in: \(X_{\succeq0}\subset X_{\succeq-1}\subset X_{\succeq-2}\subset\cdots\).

7 The lemma: Hecke translates of norm balls

Proved (cited) [SV, Lemma 5.5.2, in our conventions] For \(\lambda\in\Lambda_T^+\) and \(\mu\in\mathfrak a_X\), \[ D_{\le\lambda}\cdot X_{\succeq\mu}\subset X_{\succeq\mu-\overline\lambda}. \]

Proof. Let \(g={\kappa}_1t^{\lambda'}{\kappa}_2\) with \(\lambda'\le\lambda\) and \(x\in X_{\succeq\mu}\). By \(K\)-invariance and step 5(2), \(N_\chi(gx)=N_\chi(t^{\lambda'}{\kappa}_2x)\le-\langle\mu,\chi\rangle+\langle\lambda',\chi\rangle\). Since \(\lambda-\lambda'\) is a sum of positive coroots and \(\chi\) is dominant, \(\langle\lambda',\chi\rangle\le\langle\lambda,\chi\rangle\). \(\square\) SV state it for one double coset \(Kt^\lambda K\); the last inequality, which extends it to \(D_{\le\lambda}\), is added here.

Instance
With \(\lambda=(m,-m)\), \(\overline\lambda=2m\) and \(\mu=-a\): \[ D_{\le m}\cdot X_{\succeq-a}\subset X_{\succeq-a-2m},\qquad\text{i.e.}\qquad D_{\le m}\cdot\overline{\mathcal O}_a\subset\overline{\mathcal O}_{a+2m}. \] This is step (1) of the Proposition in the example, and the factor 2 is \(\langle\lambda,\chi\rangle\) with \(\chi=2\varpi\).
Ball \(a\):Loop size \(m\):
Figure 5. Horizontal axis: the value of \(N_\chi\), one dot per orbit \(\mathcal O_a\), with the matching \(\mu=-a\in\mathfrak a_X\) below. Light bar: the ball \(X_{\succeq-a}\); dark bar: what \(D_{\le m}\) can reach, \(\overline\lambda=2m\) further.

8 Dictionary to SV's conventions

Table 8. these pages and SV §5.5
these pagesSV §5.5
\(F=\mathbb C(\!(t)\!)\), \(t\), \(\operatorname{val}\)\(p\)-adic \(F\), uniformizer \(\varpi\), \(|\cdot|=q^{-\operatorname{val}}\)
left action \(g\cdot x\)right action \(x\cdot g^{-1}\)
\(\lambda\in\Lambda_T^+\) dominant, \(t^\lambda\)\(-\lambda\) anti-dominant, \(a_{-\lambda}\)
\(N_\chi(x)\)\(\log_q\|x\|_\chi\)
\(D_{\le\lambda}\cdot X_{\succeq\mu}\subset X_{\succeq\mu-\overline\lambda}\)\(X_{\succeq\mu}\cdot Ka_{-\lambda}K\subset X_{\succeq\mu+\overline{-\lambda}}\)
\(\overline{\mathcal O}_\nu\), \(r(\lambda)\) (orbit closures)\(X_{\succeq\mu}\), \(-\overline\lambda\) (in the example)

The draft's earlier wording, \(X_{\ge\mu}\cdot L^+Gt^\lambda L^+G\subset X_{\ge\mu+\overline\lambda}\) with \(\lambda\in\Lambda_G^-\), is the right-hand column.

SV's own wording (verbatim, pp. 85–86)
Let \(\mathcal X(\mathbf X)^+\) denote the weights of regular Borel eigenfunctions on \(\mathbf X\) … This monoid induces a partial order \(\succeq\) on the set \(\mathfrak a_X=\mathcal X(\mathbf X)^*\otimes\mathbb Q\) by: \(\mu\succeq\lambda\iff\langle\mu,\chi\rangle\ge\langle\lambda,\chi\rangle\) for all \(\chi\in\mathcal X(\mathbf X)^+\).SV p. 85
Choose a splitting … denoted by \(\mathcal X(\mathbf X)\ni\chi\mapsto f_\chi\in k(\mathbf X)^{(\mathbf B)}\). … we choose a special maximal compact subgroup \(K\subset G\) … [which] satisfies the Cartan decomposition: \(G=K\Lambda^+K\), where \(\Lambda^+\) denotes the anti-dominant elements in \(\Lambda:=\mathcal X(\mathbf B)^*\).SV p. 85
Define, for every \(\chi\in\mathcal X(\mathbf X)^+\), a \(K\)-invariant “norm” on \(X\): \(\ \|x\|_\chi:=\max_{k\in K}|f_\chi(xk)|.\)SV p. 85
5.5.1. Lemma. The norms \(\|x\|_\chi\) have the following properties: (1) \(\|x\|_{\chi_1+\chi_2}\le\|x\|_{\chi_1}\cdot\|x\|_{\chi_2}\); (2) For any \(a\in A^+\), \(\|xa\|_\chi\le|\chi(a)|\cdot\|x\|_\chi\).SV p. 85
For every \(\mu\in\mathfrak a_X\), let \(X_{\succeq\mu}\) denote the set of elements \(x\in X\) with \(\|x\|_\chi\le q^{-\langle\chi,\mu\rangle}\) for all \(\chi\in\mathcal X(\mathbf X)^+\) … (1) \(X_{\succeq\mu}\) is a set with compact closure in the points of the affine closure … (2) The sets \(X_{\succeq\mu}\) define a filtration of \(X\) by \(K\)-invariant sets, decreasing with respect to the \(\succeq\) ordering on \(\mathfrak a_X\).SV p. 86
5.5.2. Lemma. For any \(\lambda\in\Lambda^+\), \(\mu\in\mathfrak a_X\), we have: \(\ X_{\succeq\mu}\cdot Ka_\lambda K\subset X_{\succeq\mu+\overline\lambda}\), where \(\overline\lambda\) is the image of \(\lambda\) in \(\mathfrak a_X\). Proof. … since the sets are \(K\)-invariant, this reduces to the statement: \(X_{\succeq\mu}\cdot a_\lambda\subset X_{\succeq\mu+\overline\lambda}\). This follows immediately from the second statement of the previous lemma.SV p. 86

9 What does not transfer automatically

Open Norm ball vs. orbit closure. \(X_{\succeq\mu}\) is a \(K\)-invariant set cut out by inequalities, so it is a union of \(K\)-orbits. That it is a single closure \(\overline{\mathcal O}_\nu\) is checked here only for \(\mathrm{SL}_2/\mathrm{SO}_2\). In general it needs a comparison between the norms and the Chen–Yi index, which these pages do not carry out.
Open \(\overline\lambda\) vs. \(r(\lambda)\). The two agree in the example. In general this needs an identification of \(\mathfrak a_X\) with \(\Lambda_S\otimes\mathbb Q\) matching \(\overline\lambda\) with \(r(\lambda)=\lambda-\theta\lambda\), which is not checked here.
Heuristic \(p\)-adic vs. \(\mathbb C(\!(t)\!)\). SV's compactness statement uses a local field. Over \(\mathbb C(\!(t)\!)\) its replacement is the geometry of orbit closures in the ind-scheme \(LX\) (Chen–Yi). The inequalities are purely valuative and carry over.