§3 · Agent 3 · Functions ⇒ sheaves by traces · 2026-10-18T18:39:40Z
Lemma 3.2 · Functions at a finite level: bases $\{\mathbf 1_{P(\mathbb F_q)}\}$ by Lang
proved
Every $I$-invariant compactly supported smooth function on $X(F)$ is a function on the finite set $Y_{N,M}(\mathbb F_q)$ for some level, and at that level the indicators of the $\mathbb F_q$-points of the pieces form a basis (Lang's theorem with connected stabilizers).
Lemma 3.2.
Assume (L1), (L2) and Lang (D2) of Setup 3.1. For a level $(N,M)$ let $C_I^{(N,M)}$ be the functions on $X(F)$ supported in $Y_N(\mathbb F_q)$ and constant on the fibres of $\pi_{N,M}\colon Y_N(\mathbb F_q)\to Y_{N,M}(\mathbb F_q)$, and $I$-invariant. Then
(a) $C_I=C_c^\infty(X(F))^I=\bigcup_{N,M}C_I^{(N,M)}$, a directed union;
(b) $\pi_{N,M}$ is surjective on $\mathbb F_q$-points and $I(\mathcal O)\to(I/I_{N,M})(\mathbb F_q)$ is surjective, so $C_I^{(N,M)}\simeq\mathbb C[Y_{N,M}(\mathbb F_q)]^{(I/I_{N,M})(\mathbb F_q)}$;
(c) for every piece $P=\pi_{N,M}^{-1}(o)$, $o(\mathbb F_q)$ is non-empty and is a single $(I/I_{N,M})(\mathbb F_q)$-orbit; hence $\{\mathbf 1_{P(\mathbb F_q)}:P\in\mathcal P_{N,M}\}$, $P(\mathbb F_q):=Y_N(\mathbb F_q)\cap\pi_{N,M}^{-1}(o(\mathbb F_q))$, is a $\mathbb Z$-basis of the $\mathbb Z$-valued functions in $C_I^{(N,M)}$, and $\dim C_I^{(N,M)}=|\mathcal P_{N,M}|$.
- Support. Let $\varphi\in C_I$. Its support is compact and covered by the increasing open sets $Y_N(\mathbb F_q)$ (L1d), so it lies in one of them.
- Local constancy. $\varphi|{Y_N(\mathbb F_q)}$ is locally constant on a compact space whose topology has the basis of $\pi{N,M}$-fibres (L1d); finitely many basic sets suffice, and since fibres for larger $M$ refine those for smaller $M$, $\varphi$ is constant on the fibres of a single $\pi_{N,M}$. This is (a); directedness follows from (L1a,b).
- Surjectivity. Each transition $Y_{N,M+1}\to Y_{N,M}$ is an affine-space bundle over $\mathbb F_q$, so every fibre over an $\mathbb F_q$-point has $\mathbb F_q$-points; $Y_N(\mathbb F_q)=\varprojlim_MY_{N,M}(\mathbb F_q)$ and an inverse limit of surjections of finite sets surjects onto each term. $H^1(\mathbb F_q,I_{N,M})=1$ (D2) gives $I(\mathcal O)\twoheadrightarrow(I/I_{N,M})(\mathbb F_q)$. This is (b).
- Orbits over $\mathbb F_q$. $o$ is a homogeneous space under the connected group $H=I/I_{N,M}$ and is $\mathrm{Fr}$-stable (L2), so $o(\mathbb F_q)\neq\varnothing$ by Lang's theorem. For $y\in o(\mathbb F_q)$ with stabilizer $S_y$, the $H(\mathbb F_q)$-orbits on $o(\mathbb F_q)$ are in bijection with $\ker\big(H^1(\mathbb F_q,S_y)\to H^1(\mathbb F_q,H)\big)=H^1(\mathbb F_q,\pi_0S_y)=1$ (D2, connected stabilizers). So $o(\mathbb F_q)$ is one orbit.
- Basis. Every $\mathbb F_q$-point of $Y_{N,M}$ lies in a unique orbit, which then contains a rational point and so is $\mathrm{Fr}$-stable; so the sets $o(\mathbb F_q)$, $o$ running over all orbits, partition $Y_{N,M}(\mathbb F_q)$ into the $H(\mathbb F_q)$-orbits. Invariant functions on a finite set are combinations of orbit indicators; pull back along the surjection of step 3. $\square$
Remark (what is used where). Connected stabilizers enter only in step 4; without them $o(\mathbb F_q)$ splits into $|H^1(\mathbb F_q,\pi_0S_y)|$ orbits, treated in Proposition 3.7. Rationality of every orbit is used in Lemma 3.4 (every simple object is Weil), not here: an orbit without $\mathbb F_q$-points simply contributes no function.
Builds on
- Setup 3.1 · Set-up over $\mathbb F_q$: levels, the perverse heart of $\mathcal C_I$, Weil structures
Built on by
- Lemma 3.3 · Trace of $*_I$ is convolution (vol $I=1$); IC traces span $\mathcal H_I$
- Lemma 3.4 · Unitriangular IC-trace basis of $C_I$ and the decomposition matrix $m_{S,w}$
- Lemma 7.5 · Hypotheses (I1I1 · Finite levels: LX has a level presentation in which every object of C_I is pulled back from a finite level Y_{N,M} and each level has finitely many pieces (Iwahori-generation pages, Proposition III).), (I2I2 · Connected stabilizers: every stabilizer of I/I_{N,M} on Y_{N,M} is connected, so equivariant local systems on pieces are constant.), Frobenius-stability for $\mathbb A^n$ and the group; $I_{N,M}$ must be connected for Lang
- Audit 7.6 · Audit of A3-1, A3-2, A3-3: glued Weil heart, piece-indicator bases by Lang, $\mathrm{tr}(\mathcal G\ast_IM)=\mathrm{tr}\,\mathcal G\ast\mathrm{tr}\,M$ with $\mathrm{vol}(I)=1$
Original record, as the agent wrote it at 18:39 UTC
Functions at a finite level: bases $\{\mathbf 1_{P(\mathbb F_q)}\}$ by Lang
- Support. Let $\varphi\in C_I$. Its support is compact and covered by the increasing open sets $Y_N(\mathbb F_q)$ (L1d), so it lies in one of them.
- Local constancy. $\varphi|{Y_N(\mathbb F_q)}$ is locally constant on a compact space whose topology has the basis of $\pi{N,M}$-fibres (L1d); finitely many basic sets suffice, and since fibres for larger $M$ refine those for smaller $M$, $\varphi$ is constant on the fibres of a single $\pi_{N,M}$. This is (a); directedness follows from (L1a,b).
- Surjectivity. Each transition $Y_{N,M+1}\to Y_{N,M}$ is an affine-space bundle over $\mathbb F_q$, so every fibre over an $\mathbb F_q$-point has $\mathbb F_q$-points; $Y_N(\mathbb F_q)=\varprojlim_MY_{N,M}(\mathbb F_q)$ and an inverse limit of surjections of finite sets surjects onto each term. $H^1(\mathbb F_q,I_{N,M})=1$ (D2) gives $I(\mathcal O)\twoheadrightarrow(I/I_{N,M})(\mathbb F_q)$. This is (b).
- Orbits over $\mathbb F_q$. $o$ is a homogeneous space under the connected group $H=I/I_{N,M}$ and is $\mathrm{Fr}$-stable (L2), so $o(\mathbb F_q)\neq\varnothing$ by Lang's theorem. For $y\in o(\mathbb F_q)$ with stabilizer $S_y$, the $H(\mathbb F_q)$-orbits on $o(\mathbb F_q)$ are in bijection with $\ker\big(H^1(\mathbb F_q,S_y)\to H^1(\mathbb F_q,H)\big)=H^1(\mathbb F_q,\pi_0S_y)=1$ (D2, connected stabilizers). So $o(\mathbb F_q)$ is one orbit.
- Basis. Every $\mathbb F_q$-point of $Y_{N,M}$ lies in a unique orbit, which then contains a rational point and so is $\mathrm{Fr}$-stable; so the sets $o(\mathbb F_q)$, $o$ running over all orbits, partition $Y_{N,M}(\mathbb F_q)$ into the $H(\mathbb F_q)$-orbits. Invariant functions on a finite set are combinations of orbit indicators; pull back along the surjection of step 3. $\square$
Remark (what is used where). Connected stabilizers enter only in step 4; without them $o(\mathbb F_q)$ splits into $|H^1(\mathbb F_q,\pi_0S_y)|$ orbits, treated in Proposition 3.7. Rationality of every orbit is used in Lemma 3.4 (every simple object is Weil), not here: an orbit without $\mathbb F_q$-points simply contributes no function.
Sources
- trace.tex, Lemma (Orbits) = model
- milne-iag-v2.pdf, Cor. 27.56
- hypothesis.html (Levels, pieces)